Post a reply

Re: Betfred Masters 1st Round: John Higgins v Mark Allen

Postby TheRocket

KrazeeEyezKilla wrote:
Iranu wrote:Ronnie and Higgins both beat players who should be in their prime and competing for these major titles, in deciding frames of matches that the younger player probably should have won.


Ding and Allen should be the veterans holding off the young guns at this stage.


times have definitely changed.

Re: Betfred Masters 1st Round: John Higgins v Mark Allen

Postby Andre147

TheRocket wrote:
KrazeeEyezKilla wrote:
Iranu wrote:Ronnie and Higgins both beat players who should be in their prime and competing for these major titles, in deciding frames of matches that the younger player probably should have won.


Ding and Allen should be the veterans holding off the young guns at this stage.


times have definitely changed.


Seems like the 60s and 70s when players aged above 40 were top players, and only very few like Alex Higgins managed to hold them off.

Re: Betfred Masters 1st Round: John Higgins v Mark Allen

Postby Juddernaut88

hendry_fan wrote:
Juddernaut88 wrote:Hendry_fan if Higgins beats Ronnie I'll get you a few drinks.




Braw stuff Juddster. <ok>


And i,ll get you a bean n tattie pie. :-D


I'll be more then content with chips instead please :spot on:


   

cron