by Erza Scarlet » 05 Apr 2019 Read
Remember this guys?! I was just rewatching this and thought this would be the type of punishing Snooker Ronnie would need to produce at the WC again.
@Andre147
@Holden Chinaski
@Dan-Cat
@TheRocket
@Johnny Bravo
@Ash147
@Iranu
@Chalk McHugh
@masterdoctorgenius
-
Erza Scarlet
- Posts: 922
- Joined: 05 December 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by eraserhead » 05 Apr 2019 Read
Wow rude.
Edit: How didn't you include cloud as well.
Last edited by
eraserhead on 05 Apr 2019, edited 1 time in total.
-
eraserhead
- Posts: 13027
- Joined: 20 March 2015
- Location: Lancashire
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie + Ding
- Highest Break: 31
- Walk-On: Spoon - The Underdog
by Holden Chinaski » 05 Apr 2019 Read
Fantastic break. Can't believe it's already seven years ago!
-
Holden Chinaski
- Posts: 30223
- Joined: 26 July 2013
- Location: Belgium
- Snooker Idol: The Belgiums
- Walk-On: A little less conversation - Elvis
by Erza Scarlet » 05 Apr 2019 Read
eraserhead wrote:Wow rude.
Edit: How didn't you include cloud as well.
I forgot!
Last time I didn't include masterdoctorgenius and now I did but then I forgot you when I included you last time. Lots of ROS fans here.
-
Erza Scarlet
- Posts: 922
- Joined: 05 December 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by Erza Scarlet » 05 Apr 2019 Read
Holden Chinaski wrote:Fantastic break. Can't believe it's already seven years ago!
Ronnie would do well to make above 20!
-
Erza Scarlet
- Posts: 922
- Joined: 05 December 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by Holden Chinaski » 05 Apr 2019 Read
Erza Scarlet wrote:Holden Chinaski wrote:Fantastic break. Can't believe it's already seven years ago!
Ronnie would do well to make above 20!
-
Holden Chinaski
- Posts: 30223
- Joined: 26 July 2013
- Location: Belgium
- Snooker Idol: The Belgiums
- Walk-On: A little less conversation - Elvis
by Erza Scarlet » 05 Apr 2019 Read
Cool, never seen that. I'll watch it.
-
Erza Scarlet
- Posts: 922
- Joined: 05 December 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by Andre147 » 06 Apr 2019 Read
There's another historic clearance he made at the 2008 NI Open Final which was as good.
But this 92 one was more memorable given the situation. And he made a 141 break in the next frame. Freaking legend!
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41812
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by SnookerFan » 06 Apr 2019 Read
eraserhead wrote:Wow rude.
Edit: How didn't you include cloud as well.
I think he's properly dissed you there.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151097
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by TheSaviour » 06 Apr 2019 Read
But was it that good that you would be completely unable to speak ? If so, we could have future lol. The politics needs the NAMES whose NAMES would suggest they are completely unable to speak lol. As we all do know that the person´s names just simply does almost all the telling. I know a guy who has such a name lol. So can´t much than to hope it would snowball and he would be having a great future. We needs the persons who won´t be making ANY promises. As there seems to be no way to dictate the people what they would wear or so. So can just mention to them, that pssst, don´t be making any promises. As you would just disappoint me once again. With those promises. As they never holds.
But that´s just the tennis-lads. But surely Andrew Murray understood many things right too... Remember those analyses of how the people are just unable to say even hello, not to even mention deserving any looks...
But obviously any given fan-base is based on the fact one surely want´s to prove his/her point to be correct. Any given fan is just about to prove something to be correct. And that´s just fine. So can any these historic clearances prove something ?
-
TheSaviour
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: 27 May 2014
- Location: Vandalising is boring when you have nothing to say.
- Snooker Idol: At times David Gilbert.
- Highest Break: 147
by Erza Scarlet » 07 Apr 2019 Read
TheSaviour wrote:But was it that good that you would be completely unable to speak ? If so, we could have future lol. The politics needs the NAMES whose NAMES would suggest they are completely unable to speak lol. As we all do know that the person´s names just simply does almost all the telling. I know a guy who has such a name lol. So can´t much than to hope it would snowball and he would be having a great future. We needs the persons who won´t be making ANY promises. As there seems to be no way to dictate the people what they would wear or so. So can just mention to them, that pssst, don´t be making any promises. As you would just disappoint me once again. With those promises. As they never holds.
But that´s just the tennis-lads. But surely Andrew Murray understood many things right too... Remember those analyses of how the people are just unable to say even hello, not to even mention deserving any looks...
But obviously any given fan-base is based on the fact one surely want´s to prove his/her point to be correct. Any given fan is just about to prove something to be correct. And that´s just fine. So can any these historic clearances prove something ?
What?
-
Erza Scarlet
- Posts: 922
- Joined: 05 December 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by Johnny Bravo » 09 Apr 2019 Read
Erza Scarlet wrote:TheSaviour wrote:But was it that good that you would be completely unable to speak ? If so, we could have future lol. The politics needs the NAMES whose NAMES would suggest they are completely unable to speak lol. As we all do know that the person´s names just simply does almost all the telling. I know a guy who has such a name lol. So can´t much than to hope it would snowball and he would be having a great future. We needs the persons who won´t be making ANY promises. As there seems to be no way to dictate the people what they would wear or so. So can just mention to them, that pssst, don´t be making any promises. As you would just disappoint me once again. With those promises. As they never holds.
But that´s just the tennis-lads. But surely Andrew Murray understood many things right too... Remember those analyses of how the people are just unable to say even hello, not to even mention deserving any looks...
But obviously any given fan-base is based on the fact one surely want´s to prove his/her point to be correct. Any given fan is just about to prove something to be correct. And that´s just fine. So can any these historic clearances prove something ?
What?
Don't mind him, he's trolling as usual.
-
Johnny Bravo
- Posts: 7403
- Joined: 24 November 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie O Sullivan
- Highest Break: 122
by SnookerFan » 10 Apr 2019 Read
Erza Scarlet wrote:TheSaviour wrote:But was it that good that you would be completely unable to speak ? If so, we could have future lol. The politics needs the NAMES whose NAMES would suggest they are completely unable to speak lol. As we all do know that the person´s names just simply does almost all the telling. I know a guy who has such a name lol. So can´t much than to hope it would snowball and he would be having a great future. We needs the persons who won´t be making ANY promises. As there seems to be no way to dictate the people what they would wear or so. So can just mention to them, that pssst, don´t be making any promises. As you would just disappoint me once again. With those promises. As they never holds.
But that´s just the tennis-lads. But surely Andrew Murray understood many things right too... Remember those analyses of how the people are just unable to say even hello, not to even mention deserving any looks...
But obviously any given fan-base is based on the fact one surely want´s to prove his/her point to be correct. Any given fan is just about to prove something to be correct. And that´s just fine. So can any these historic clearances prove something ?
What?
I think his meaning was clear.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151097
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-