Post a reply

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby Cloud Strife

Dan-cat wrote:wow - this is quite serious now. Just seen on Twitter that Fouldsy has been suspended for that slip. TV rules are ridiculous. So we won't have him for the remaining semi or final. I'm incensed.


For real?

That's pretty nonsensical. I don't think even the BBC are this stuck up about that sort of thing.

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby vodkadiet

Dan-cat wrote:Doug Mountjoy is on the train from Glamorgan as his replacement. Finally Doug will have his TV moment


If Doug is commentating they are going to need subtitles.....

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby Iranu

Holden Chinaski wrote:
Dan-cat wrote:Doug Mountjoy is on the train from Glamorgan

I heard Thorburn is flying over. First class obviously.

I'm pretty sure he's coming over on a boat.

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby SnookerFan

Iranu wrote:
Holden Chinaski wrote:
Dan-cat wrote:Doug Mountjoy is on the train from Glamorgan

I heard Thorburn is flying over. First class obviously.

I'm pretty sure he's coming over on a boat.


Is he with the Chinese lads?

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby SnookerFan

Chalk McHugh wrote:Is this a joke that Fouldsy is gone after using unparliamentary language?


I think it was like the time Dan-Cat brought us the news that Mark King was wearing a wig.

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby Chalk McHugh

SnookerFan wrote:
Chalk McHugh wrote:Is this a joke that Fouldsy is gone after using unparliamentary language?


I think it was like the time Dan-Cat brought us the news that Mark King was wearing a wig.


Haha, hard to know here sometimes. Sonetimes truth is stranger than fiction.

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby Dan-cat

Chalk McHugh wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:
Chalk McHugh wrote:Is this a joke that Fouldsy is gone after using unparliamentary language?


I think it was like the time Dan-Cat brought us the news that Mark King was wearing a wig.


Haha, hard to know here sometimes. Sonetimes truth is stranger than fiction.


Hehehe I had some of you for a moment with that one.

I'm way less silly on here than I am in real life, you should be thankful!

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby SteveJJ

SnookerFan wrote:
Iranu wrote:
Holden Chinaski wrote:
Dan-cat wrote:Doug Mountjoy is on the train from Glamorgan

I heard Thorburn is flying over. First class obviously.

I'm pretty sure he's coming over on a boat.


Is he with the Chinese lads?

and if none of them make it, SF is on his way up for his punditry debut.

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby Holden Chinaski

SteveJJ wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:
Iranu wrote:
Holden Chinaski wrote:
Dan-cat wrote:Doug Mountjoy is on the train from Glamorgan

I heard Thorburn is flying over. First class obviously.

I'm pretty sure he's coming over on a boat.


Is he with the Chinese lads?

and if none of them make it, SF is on his way up for his punditry debut.

:bowdown:

We would probably hear the sound of candy wrappers and bags of crisps throughout the match rofl

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby vodkadiet

Jill placed her hand on Neal there. Is this sexual harassment? Is she after Neal's 'crown jewells? Who could blame her for wanting to seduce Neal? She has desires, just like the rest of us.

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby SnookerFan

vodkadiet wrote:Jill placed her hand on Neal there. Is this sexual harassment? Is she after Neal's 'crown jewells? Who could blame her for wanting to seduce Neal? She has desires, just like the rest of us.


#nealtoo

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby Badsnookerplayer

SnookerFan wrote:
vodkadiet wrote:Jill placed her hand on Neal there. Is this sexual harassment? Is she after Neal's 'crown jewells? Who could blame her for wanting to seduce Neal? She has desires, just like the rest of us.


#nealtoo

rofl rofl rofl

Re: Did Jill Douglas need to apologise?

Postby Andy Spark

It sounded a bit like “rubbish” but not conclusive evidence either way. Outrageous if he was suspended for that, given the indistinct nature of the utterance.