by Badsnookerplayer » 02 May 2017 Read
Just thought I would post this as it made me smile. All courtesy of Wikipedia
Fred Davis:
Forced to concentrate on snooker, Fred first played in the World Snooker Championship in 1937 but lost 17–14 to Welshman Bill Withers in the first round, a defeat that Davis put down to ignoring his worsening eyesight.His brother Joe considered this defeat an affront to the family honour and hammered Withers 30–1 in the very next round.
Fred played professionally well into old age, making his last appearance in the World Snooker Championship at the Crucible Theatre in 1984 aged 70, where he lost to Bill Werbeniuk 10–4.
Davis only retired in 1993, aged 79, having lost to future world champion Ronnie O'Sullivan (62 years his junior) 5–1 in the Grand Prix qualifying during his last season. Davis lost 10–1 to Peter Daubney in the first round of qualifying for the 1992 World Championship, an effort which still netted him £500. Just four months later he would lose 6–0 to Mark Davis in the sixth round of qualifying for the 1993 event; it would be Davis' last World Championship match.
On 14 August 1993 Davis turned 80, and still held a ranking of 259. Even then he stated that he would have loved to continue playing, but was prevented from doing so by the severe arthritis in his left knee which made it painful to walk. Indeed, it was Davis' attempt to redistribute his stance which contributed to such heavy defeats in his final snooker matches
Respect.
-
Badsnookerplayer
- Posts: 26554
- Joined: 05 February 2017
- Snooker Idol: Bill Werbeniuk
by KrazeeEyezKilla » 02 May 2017 Read
Badsnookerplayer wrote:Forced to concentrate on snooker, Fred first played in the World Snooker Championship in 1937 but lost 17–14 to Welshman Bill Withers in the first round, a defeat that Davis put down to ignoring his worsening eyesight.His brother Joe considered this defeat an affront to the family honour and hammered Withers 30–1 in the very next round.
That wasn't a "lovely day" for Bill Withers
-
KrazeeEyezKilla
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: 16 November 2009
- Location: Ireland
- Highest Break: 26
- Walk-On: Dazz Band - Let It All Blow
by Pink Ball » 02 May 2017 Read
KrazeeEyezKilla wrote:Badsnookerplayer wrote:Forced to concentrate on snooker, Fred first played in the World Snooker Championship in 1937 but lost 17–14 to Welshman Bill Withers in the first round, a defeat that Davis put down to ignoring his worsening eyesight.His brother Joe considered this defeat an affront to the family honour and hammered Withers 30–1 in the very next round.
That wasn't a "lovely day" for Bill Withers
I hope he had somebody to lean on.
-
Pink Ball
- Posts: 22336
- Joined: 07 April 2015
- Location: Galway city, Ireland
- Snooker Idol: You are a banker
- Walk-On: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkfgIUiCiUQ
by PLtheRef » 02 May 2017 Read
Withers second round defeat came a time where all of the frames were played. I'm fairly sure had it been just best of 31 that Joe would have won the match in a whitewash
-
PLtheRef
- Posts: 5078
- Joined: 20 December 2009
- Location: Sheffield
- Highest Break: 28
- Walk-On: Vangelis 1492 Conquest of Paradise
by Pink Ball » 02 May 2017 Read
PLtheRef wrote:Withers second round defeat came a time where all of the frames were played. I'm fairly sure had it been just best of 31 that Joe would have won the match in a whitewash
The tour hasn't been the same without Withers. Ain't no sunshine when he's gone.
-
Pink Ball
- Posts: 22336
- Joined: 07 April 2015
- Location: Galway city, Ireland
- Snooker Idol: You are a banker
- Walk-On: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkfgIUiCiUQ
by Dan-cat » 03 May 2017 Read
Pink Ball wrote:PLtheRef wrote:Withers second round defeat came a time where all of the frames were played. I'm fairly sure had it been just best of 31 that Joe would have won the match in a whitewash
The tour hasn't been the same without Withers. Ain't no sunshine when he's gone.
Lolz Pinkie.
I love this... Fred making a century against Kirk Stephens at the age of 65. Even the ref claps. Brilliant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adO-TFmUTEg
-
Dan-cat
- Posts: 31524
- Joined: 20 August 2013
- Location: Shoreditch, London
- Snooker Idol: The Rocket + The Nugget
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: www.instagram.com/dan_cat
-
by Badsnookerplayer » 03 May 2017 Read
Fantastic Dan-Cat I really enjoyed watching that. Interesting to see the crossover b
-
Badsnookerplayer
- Posts: 26554
- Joined: 05 February 2017
- Snooker Idol: Bill Werbeniuk
by Badsnookerplayer » 03 May 2017 Read
Fantastic Dan-Cat I really enjoyed watching that. Interesting to see the crossover between the last vestiges of the era of Fred Davis and co. and what was about to come. Great!
-
Badsnookerplayer
- Posts: 26554
- Joined: 05 February 2017
- Snooker Idol: Bill Werbeniuk
by Dan-cat » 03 May 2017 Read
Badsnookerplayer wrote:Fantastic Dan-Cat I really enjoyed watching that. Interesting to see the crossover between the last vestiges of the era of Fred Davis and co. and what was about to come. Great!
It's utterly joyous isn't it :)
-
Dan-cat
- Posts: 31524
- Joined: 20 August 2013
- Location: Shoreditch, London
- Snooker Idol: The Rocket + The Nugget
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: www.instagram.com/dan_cat
-
by Alex0paul » 03 May 2017 Read
I love Fred Davis
-
Alex0paul
- Posts: 27311
- Joined: 03 December 2009
- Location: Plymouth
- Snooker Idol: Graeme Dott Joe OConnor
- Highest Break: 97
- Walk-On: Loco in Acapulco
-
Badsnookerplayer
- Posts: 26554
- Joined: 05 February 2017
- Snooker Idol: Bill Werbeniuk
by mick745 » 04 May 2017 Read
I looked up the match Joe Davis v Bill Withers from the 1937 WSC. It turns out that although Joe won the first two frames Withers won the third to make it 2-1. Joe Davis then reeled off an astonishing 28 frames in a row. The match was played on 4, 5 & 6th March 1937. Withers highest break was 58 although not in the frame he won.
Also, it is remarkable that Fred Davis, despite his advancing years and deteriorating health managed to win a frame off a young Ronnie O'Sullivan in 1992.
-
mick745
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: 02 January 2017
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
by SnookerEd25 » 05 May 2017 Read
Badsnookerplayer wrote:That is a great stat from the 1937 match. It would seem that Joe was feeling quite ruthless.
I looked the match up too and was surprised how many frames Withers scored relatively highly given the result.
http://cuetracker.net/tournaments/world ... p/1937/941I would have expected far more very one sided frames.
Just a thought - they played out 'dead' frames in those days (IE in a best of 35, all 35 frames would be played regardless of when one player hit 18); did they also play out 'dead' points as well? IE, if a player was, say 65 behind with 35 on, the frame would continue until the final black had been potted? Not necessarily, the player far behind playing for Snookers, but maybe more that it was somehow seen as ungentlemanly to concede a frame, so they saw playing it out as potting practice? I don't know for sure, but it would explain some of the higher scores. I bet Clive knows...
-
SnookerEd25
- Posts: 18686
- Joined: 10 October 2011
- Location: West London
- Snooker Idol: Cliff Wilson
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: Play with Fire (Rolling Stones)
by Badsnookerplayer » 05 May 2017 Read
Hey snookered25 I think you could well be right although I have never heard of that before. All of the frame scores are above 100 in total. I think that sometimes they decided matches by aggregate point scores too(?).
Interestingly (?) in the match that Withers beat Fred Davis by 17 frames to 14, the point scores are as below for the frames for which this was recorded:
Withers 892
Davis 815
-
Badsnookerplayer
- Posts: 26554
- Joined: 05 February 2017
- Snooker Idol: Bill Werbeniuk
by SnookerFan » 10 Jan 2018 Read
Badsnookerplayer wrote:His brother Joe considered this defeat an affront to the family honour and hammered Withers 30–1 in the very next round.
DECLINE!
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 150995
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Alex0paul » 18 Jul 2019 Read
Fred Davis has declined
-
Alex0paul
- Posts: 27311
- Joined: 03 December 2009
- Location: Plymouth
- Snooker Idol: Graeme Dott Joe OConnor
- Highest Break: 97
- Walk-On: Loco in Acapulco
by SnookerFan » 18 Jul 2019 Read
Alex0paul wrote:Fred Davis has declined
Well, to be fair to him, he's been dead for more than 20 years.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 150995
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by lhpirnie » 19 Jul 2019 Read
mick745 wrote:I looked up the match Joe Davis v Bill Withers from the 1937 WSC. It turns out that although Joe won the first two frames Withers won the third to make it 2-1. Joe Davis then reeled off an astonishing 28 frames in a row. The match was played on 4, 5 & 6th March 1937. Withers highest break was 58 although not in the frame he won.
Also, it is remarkable that Fred Davis, despite his advancing years and deteriorating health managed to win a frame off a young Ronnie O'Sullivan in 1992.
Yes, Fred Davis was pretty terrible at that time, perhaps Ronnie gave him the frame. His knee problem meant he was allowed to wear special shoes. The same of course happened to Ronnie years later when he broke his ankle. How history repeats itself!
A parallel to the meeting of these two champions, separated by 62 years, might be Yan Bingtao meeting Ray Reardon at the World Championship opening ceremony in 2017. Yan was 17 and Reardon 84, but as far as I know didn't play a frame against each other.
-
lhpirnie
- Posts: 2391
- Joined: 06 April 2019
- Location: London, UK
- Highest Break: 132
-
by Alex0paul » 19 Jul 2019 Read
-
Alex0paul
- Posts: 27311
- Joined: 03 December 2009
- Location: Plymouth
- Snooker Idol: Graeme Dott Joe OConnor
- Highest Break: 97
- Walk-On: Loco in Acapulco
by KrazeeEyezKilla » 19 Jul 2019 Read
The one thing snooker is missing is massive age gaps between players. Too many players born in the 70's/early 80's.
-
KrazeeEyezKilla
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: 16 November 2009
- Location: Ireland
- Highest Break: 26
- Walk-On: Dazz Band - Let It All Blow
by lhpirnie » 19 Jul 2019 Read
KrazeeEyezKilla wrote:The one thing snooker is missing is massive age gaps between players. Too many players born in the 70's/early 80's.
Some would argue that there is too much of an age spread. There are teenagers who are probably too young, and some players over 50 who probably won't be winning many matches. The lower reaches of the professional rankings are too competitive these days to allow players aged 60+ to survive.
-
lhpirnie
- Posts: 2391
- Joined: 06 April 2019
- Location: London, UK
- Highest Break: 132
-
by Wildey » 20 Jul 2019 Read
Badsnookerplayer wrote:As it says at the end - if it wasn't for Fred keeping the flame burning we might have no snooker now. Probably an overstatement but I challenge you not to smile at the gentleman's skill and attitude.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2xhawtDztoWell done Jopesalami
Its not far off
In the 50s and 60s you had a hand full of players that just kept the game in the conscious of people and Fred was one of them.
It meant that Rex Williams who was instrumental in forming a governing body to take snooker forward could inspire the likes of Ray Reardon, John Spencer to turn pro and then of course Alex Higgins and then it took off.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64447
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Cloud Strife » 20 Jul 2019 Read
Wildey wrote:Badsnookerplayer wrote:As it says at the end - if it wasn't for Fred keeping the flame burning we might have no snooker now. Probably an overstatement but I challenge you not to smile at the gentleman's skill and attitude.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2xhawtDztoWell done Jopesalami
Its not far off
In the 50s and 60s you had a hand full of players that just kept the game in the conscious of people and Fred was one of them.
It meant that Rex Williams who was instrumental in forming a governing body to take snooker forward could inspire the likes of Ray Reardon, John Spencer to turn pro and then of course Alex Higgins and then it took off.
And then along came Ronnie O'Sullivan, and the game was never in better shape worldwide.
-
Cloud Strife
- Posts: 18564
- Joined: 28 January 2014
- Location: Antarctica
- Snooker Idol: Roger Federer
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Don Vedda - buck You
-
by Badsnookerplayer » 20 Jul 2019 Read
Cloud Strife wrote:Wildey wrote:Badsnookerplayer wrote:As it says at the end - if it wasn't for Fred keeping the flame burning we might have no snooker now. Probably an overstatement but I challenge you not to smile at the gentleman's skill and attitude.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2xhawtDztoWell done Jopesalami
Its not far off
In the 50s and 60s you had a hand full of players that just kept the game in the conscious of people and Fred was one of them.
It meant that Rex Williams who was instrumental in forming a governing body to take snooker forward could inspire the likes of Ray Reardon, John Spencer to turn pro and then of course Alex Higgins and then it took off.
And then along came Ronnie O'Sullivan, and the game was never in better shape worldwide.
bullocks - the game declined massively in Ronnie's prime years.
Only since Judd came along in about 2010 did it take off globally and financially
-
Badsnookerplayer
- Posts: 26554
- Joined: 05 February 2017
- Snooker Idol: Bill Werbeniuk
by Cloud Strife » 20 Jul 2019 Read
Badsnookerplayer wrote:Cloud Strife wrote:Wildey wrote:Badsnookerplayer wrote:As it says at the end - if it wasn't for Fred keeping the flame burning we might have no snooker now. Probably an overstatement but I challenge you not to smile at the gentleman's skill and attitude.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2xhawtDztoWell done Jopesalami
Its not far off
In the 50s and 60s you had a hand full of players that just kept the game in the conscious of people and Fred was one of them.
It meant that Rex Williams who was instrumental in forming a governing body to take snooker forward could inspire the likes of Ray Reardon, John Spencer to turn pro and then of course Alex Higgins and then it took off.
And then along came Ronnie O'Sullivan, and the game was never in better shape worldwide.
bullocks - the game declined massively in Ronnie's prime years.
Only since Judd came along in about 2010 did it take off globally and financially
You're right, the game was on its bottom, and if not for Ronnie it would have been completely stone dead. He was the one that single-handedly kept it alive.
-
Cloud Strife
- Posts: 18564
- Joined: 28 January 2014
- Location: Antarctica
- Snooker Idol: Roger Federer
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Don Vedda - buck You
-