by TheRocket » 15 Dec 2016 Read
Wow, Allen. Even I would have come a lot closer to pot that.
-
TheRocket
- Posts: 16395
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by Dan-cat » 15 Dec 2016 Read
Ronnie is simply having a wonderful Christmas time.
-
Dan-cat
- Posts: 31351
- Joined: 20 August 2013
- Location: Shoreditch, London
- Snooker Idol: The Rocket + The Nugget
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: www.instagram.com/dan_cat
-
by TheRocket » 15 Dec 2016 Read
It'd be brillant if he hammers Higgins tomorrow in front of his scottish home crowd.
-
TheRocket
- Posts: 16395
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by TheRocket » 15 Dec 2016 Read
Well, I thought Ronnie would win it in one visit there, which he hasn't done. Match is still alive.
-
TheRocket
- Posts: 16395
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by Johnny Bravo » 15 Dec 2016 Read
Ronnie misses easy balls again.
He should have potted that red to the middle pocket and finish the match.
-
Johnny Bravo
- Posts: 7401
- Joined: 24 November 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie O Sullivan
- Highest Break: 122
by Incident on 57th street 20 » 15 Dec 2016 Read
Johnny Bravo wrote:Ronnie misses easy balls again.
He should have potted that red to the middle pocket and finish the match.
I agree.
-
Incident on 57th street 20
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: 09 October 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie- Federer- Zidane
by Cloud Strife » 15 Dec 2016 Read
Made a mess of that cannon...
-
Cloud Strife
- Posts: 18548
- Joined: 28 January 2014
- Location: Antarctica
- Snooker Idol: Roger Federer
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Don Vedda - buck You
-
by Snooker Overdrive » 15 Dec 2016 Read
Quarter finals are best of 9. Gives the likely Ronnie v Higgins match more credibility.
-
Snooker Overdrive
- Posts: 13796
- Joined: 10 December 2010
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by Johnny Bravo » 15 Dec 2016 Read
He won it in the end.
A pretty good performance overall.
Still not satisfied with his tactical game. IMO his safety shot selection isn't that great at the moment.
The best example is frame 3 where it took him around 3-4 minutes on a very easy safety: put the red that's next to the white safe on the right side cushion and take the white near the yellow ball area, so Mark can't pot the red that was next to the top left cushion.
Looks like he's gonna be up against Higgins next. I hope he beats the fatso.
-
Johnny Bravo
- Posts: 7401
- Joined: 24 November 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie O Sullivan
- Highest Break: 122
by Johnny Bravo » 15 Dec 2016 Read
Anyway, I'm very happy he made 3 centuries today. Getting ever closer to that magical 1000.
He's now the top century maker so far this season, being tied up with the Slowby grinder.
Like Andre said, this could be his best season in term of the number of centuries he makes.
-
Johnny Bravo
- Posts: 7401
- Joined: 24 November 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie O Sullivan
- Highest Break: 122
by Andre147 » 15 Dec 2016 Read
Snooker Overdrive wrote:Quarter finals are best of 9. Gives the likely Ronnie v Higgins match more credibility.
Yeah.
Enjoyed the match, Ron started superb, then took those 3 min on that shot which wasn't necesary, but won it well in the end.
Ronnie could very well have to beat Higgins and then Trump on his way to the Final, those 2 of course beating him in Finals this season.
If he beats them, then can't see anyone stopping him from winning the whole thing.
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41730
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by Andre147 » 16 Dec 2016 Read
Ronnie plays tomorrow at 12 pm... strange time for him to play, I would expect it to be at 2 or the evening session.
Not that I care too much, I'll watch it the same way,
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41730
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by Snooker Overdrive » 16 Dec 2016 Read
Andre147 wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:Quarter finals are best of 9. Gives the likely Ronnie v Higgins match more credibility.
Yeah.
Enjoyed the match, Ron started superb, then took those 3 min on that shot which wasn't necesary, but won it well in the end.
Ronnie could very well have to beat Higgins and then Trump on his way to the Final, those 2 of course beating him in Finals this season.
If he beats them, then can't see anyone stopping him from winning the whole thing.
Better losing before the final than another defeat in a final.
-
Snooker Overdrive
- Posts: 13796
- Joined: 10 December 2010
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by PoolBoy » 16 Dec 2016 Read
^^^
"Better losing before the final than another defeat in a final"I just don't follow that 'logic' at all!!
Why would losing in the semis (to Anthony Hamilton - for example) be 'better' than losing to him in a Final?!
-
PoolBoy
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: 14 April 2014
- Location: Inverness
by TheRocket » 16 Dec 2016 Read
PoolBoy wrote:^^^
"Better losing before the final than another defeat in a final"I just don't follow that 'logic' at all!!
Why would losing in the semis (to Anthony Hamilton - for example) be 'better' than losing to him in a Final?!
You should know the answer. Theres nothing worse than losing a final.
Unless youre a journeyman and thus a final is incredible and something special to you. But for a topplayer, and especially a legend finals doesnt mean anything unless you win it
-
TheRocket
- Posts: 16395
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by Andre147 » 16 Dec 2016 Read
PoolBoy wrote:^^^
"Better losing before the final than another defeat in a final"I just don't follow that 'logic' at all!!
Why would losing in the semis (to Anthony Hamilton - for example) be 'better' than losing to him in a Final?!
Me neither mate.
Some even said they would have prefered Ronnie to lose in the Semis of the UK than lose in the Final to Selby
even if Ronnie were to lose his 4th Final in a row, isn't it better to be just 1 match away from winning a title than 2?
I always want Ronnie to win, even if it means his chances are slim in the following match.
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41730
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by Andre147 » 16 Dec 2016 Read
It's true Finals are meant to be won.
But if someone said to me at the start of the week: Andre, Ronnie is gonna lose in the Final. Do you want him to lose earlier than that or do you still want him to reach the Final?
My answer is pretty obvious from my statment above.
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41730
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by TheRocket » 16 Dec 2016 Read
Andre147 wrote:It's true Finals are meant to be won.
But if someone said to me at the start of the week: Andre, Ronnie is gonna lose in the Final. Do you want him to lose earlier than that or do you still want him to reach the Final?
My answer is pretty obvious from my statment above.
I understand your point. And everyone thinks different of course. But if someone told you, hes gonna lose a final to Selby and as second choice lets say lose against Ding in the semis I would take the latter one.
Not just losing a final hurts but losing it to Selby hurts even more.
Depends on the overall situation. But in the end youre remebered for winning the titles, not reaching the final.
But again. Everyone thinks differently about this. I remember Skullman thought the same as me regarding this. One of the very few things we agreed on.
-
TheRocket
- Posts: 16395
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by Andre147 » 16 Dec 2016 Read
I would still prefer him losing to Selby.
Yes we think diferently on this one, that's what makes things interesting.
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41730
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by vodkadiet » 16 Dec 2016 Read
Mark Allen wouldn't have been in the top 64 if he had been playing in the 80s....
-
vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings
by SnookerFan » 16 Dec 2016 Read
Snooker Overdrive wrote:
Better losing before the final than another defeat in a final.
Not sure I agree with that.
Hendry used to say losing the first round was the same as losing a final. Losing was still losing.
Not sure how losing before the final can be deemed better.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 149610
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by SnookerFan » 16 Dec 2016 Read
TheRocket wrote:Not just losing a final hurts but losing it to Selby hurts even more.
Ronnie doesn't see it that way. He's publicly stated on many occasions, that he respects Selby's style.
There has been needle between the two in the past, but I think that's a lot less now than it used to be. They've even played exhibitions together.
This whole "we must hate Selby because we like Ronnie" logic on seems to exist in the minds of certain fans. I don't see Ronnie encouraging it at all.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 149610
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by TheWizard » 16 Dec 2016 Read
haha you would think some of you have never watched a game of snooker with some of the comments!!
It would be better for ROS to get beat earlier rather than another final? Where is the logic in that? Maybe he would like you to believe that when Higgins beats him today.
Allen wouldnt get into top 64 if he was playing in the 80's? hahaha thats right, the bags were as tight as they are now, the balls were as light, cloths were as fast and everyone went for their pots back then like they do today. Nonsense. Allen would have won a lot more than he has if he was playing back then.
Hopefully Higgins does the business again today and sends ROS homewards to think again.
-
TheWizard
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 16 December 2016