Post a reply

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Smart

Cloud Strife wrote:
Smart wrote:
Cloud Strife wrote:DAY SIX TABLE (12/15)

54 CLARA8633 8 - 3
53 SMART 9 - 1
53 SUNDAYGIRL 7 - 3
52 CLOUD STRIFE 8 - 2
49 WILDEY 7 - 3
49 SNOOKERFAN 7 - 2
46 ANDRE147 8 - 1
43 ERASERHEAD 7 - 1
39 JMAL1 7 - 1
39 PLTHEREF 7 - 1
38 KOLOMPAR 6 - 2
38 HOLDEN CHINASKI 6 - 1
36 BORIS_THE_BUTCHER 6 - 1
35 THECLEAVER 7 - 0
34 SKULLMAN 6 - 1
34 KING.KAUTO 6 - 1
33 PASUNEGIRAFE 5 - 2
24 VODKADIET 4 - 1

Wildey gone quiet as a mouse
.......shsssssssshhhhh


Wildey ain't scored a single point for about 3 days. rofl

Peaked on day 3 :lol:

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby SnookerFan

RJFindlay wrote:
Skullman wrote:And all over. No one I really like left in the tournament now.

Basically everyone who played well first round went out. If the pattern repeats we'll have a Hawkins v Bingham final.


What a waste of a perfectly good week if it comes to that.


That's the final I want.

Yes, I am serious.

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Cloud Strife

RJFindlay wrote:
Skullman wrote:And all over. No one I really like left in the tournament now.

Basically everyone who played well first round went out. If the pattern repeats we'll have a Hawkins v Bingham final.


What a waste of a perfectly good week if it comes to that.


RJFindlay :bowdown:

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Andre147

PoolBoy wrote:All the semi-finalists are from England. Only the second time this has happened at the Masters - the previous time was in 1988 (Steve Davis, John Parrott, Joe Johnson, Mike Hallett).


Hopefully not another whitewash in a Final like that year rofl

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Wildey

Cloud Strife wrote:
Smart wrote:
Cloud Strife wrote:DAY SIX TABLE (12/15)

54 CLARA8633 8 - 3
53 SMART 9 - 1
53 SUNDAYGIRL 7 - 3
52 CLOUD STRIFE 8 - 2
49 WILDEY 7 - 3
49 SNOOKERFAN 7 - 2
46 ANDRE147 8 - 1
43 ERASERHEAD 7 - 1
39 JMAL1 7 - 1
39 PLTHEREF 7 - 1
38 KOLOMPAR 6 - 2
38 HOLDEN CHINASKI 6 - 1
36 BORIS_THE_BUTCHER 6 - 1
35 THECLEAVER 7 - 0
34 SKULLMAN 6 - 1
34 KING.KAUTO 6 - 1
33 PASUNEGIRAFE 5 - 2
24 VODKADIET 4 - 1

Wildey gone quiet as a mouse
.......shsssssssshhhhh


Wildey ain't scored a single point for about 3 days. rofl


and im stil only 5 points behind as i said you all have missed the boat big time

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Cloud Strife

SnookerFan wrote:
RJFindlay wrote:
Skullman wrote:And all over. No one I really like left in the tournament now.

Basically everyone who played well first round went out. If the pattern repeats we'll have a Hawkins v Bingham final.


What a waste of a perfectly good week if it comes to that.


That's the final I want.

Yes, I am serious.


:chin:

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Wildey

Smart wrote:Missed the boat or you screwed up royally.....letting the lot back in.....errmmmm, you screwed up :wave:

no i like to think of it as giving a bunch of losers false hope <ok>

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Cloud Strife

Wildey wrote:
Smart wrote:Missed the boat or you screwed up royally.....letting the lot back in.....errmmmm, you screwed up :wave:

no i like to think of it as giving a bunch of losers false hope <ok>


You should worry about whether or not you'll even get another point in this contest. Baby steps and all that.

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Wildey

anyway back to the important stuff.


John in this match highlighted why winning the World Championship is beyond him now he is so inconsistent from match to match never mind having to play 3 or 4 session matches.

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Smart

Cloud Strife wrote:
Wildey wrote:
Smart wrote:Missed the boat or you screwed up royally.....letting the lot back in.....errmmmm, you screwed up :wave:

no i like to think of it as giving a bunch of losers false hope <ok>


You should worry about whether or not you'll even get another point in this contest. Baby steps and all that.

Strife :bowdown:

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Holden Chinaski

Wildey wrote:
Smart wrote:Missed the boat or you screwed up royally.....letting the lot back in.....errmmmm, you screwed up :wave:

no i like to think of it as giving a bunch of losers false hope <ok>

I predicted Ronnie to beat Selby 6-3. That's good enough for me. :-)

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Wildey

Smart wrote:
Cloud Strife wrote:
Wildey wrote:
Smart wrote:Missed the boat or you screwed up royally.....letting the lot back in.....errmmmm, you screwed up :wave:

no i like to think of it as giving a bunch of losers false hope <ok>


You should worry about whether or not you'll even get another point in this contest. Baby steps and all that.

Strife :bowdown:

losers always stick together at least you can console each other on sunday :-D

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Cloud Strife

Wildey wrote:anyway back to the important stuff.


John in this match highlighted why winning the World Championship is beyond him now he is so inconsistent from match to match never mind having to play 3 or 4 session matches.


Not important now you know you ain't got a chance.

Toys out of the pram mentality, IMO. rofl

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Cloud Strife

Holden Chinaski wrote:
Wildey wrote:
Smart wrote:Missed the boat or you screwed up royally.....letting the lot back in.....errmmmm, you screwed up :wave:

no i like to think of it as giving a bunch of losers false hope <ok>

I predicted Ronnie to beat Selby 6-3. That's good enough for me. :-)


Holden. :bowdown:

That was a class prediction, IMO. :hatoff:

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby Holden Chinaski

Cloud Strife wrote:
Holden Chinaski wrote:
Wildey wrote:
Smart wrote:Missed the boat or you screwed up royally.....letting the lot back in.....errmmmm, you screwed up :wave:

no i like to think of it as giving a bunch of losers false hope <ok>

I predicted Ronnie to beat Selby 6-3. That's good enough for me. :-)


Holden. :bowdown:

That was a class prediction, IMO. :hatoff:

Thanks Cloud. :hatoff:

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby PoolBoy

What a difference from Higgins compared to his last match, where he was majestic. Yes, there were still moments tonight, where he showed his class - but there were far too many uncharacteristic weaknesses in his game there. Some poor misses coupled with an un-Higgins-like lack of composure at crucial times.
he's still got the ability, but finding it on a consistent basis seems to be the challenge now.

However, one crumb of comfort is that this is the Masters, and although prestigious, doesn't have any bearing on the ranking list.
A quick glance at this season's (one year) list sees Higgins comfortably at the top, with more than double the points of the 4th placed player.
It's too early to be writing his snooker obituary just yet!

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby snooker_loopy

Yesterday afternoon after the Trump/Robertson match Hazel asked John Parrott and Stephen Hendry who would win this match and they dismissed Bingham's chances. They were dismissive of the fact Bingham is the current world champion and just assumed Higgins - with the better track record - was going to win. I'm glad they were proven wrong. It just goes to show great snooker players make lousy 'experts' when predicting winners! :-D

Re: Dafabet Masters Q Final : John Higgins v Stuart Bingham

Postby SnookerFan

snooker_loopy wrote:Yesterday afternoon after the Trump/Robertson match Hazel asked John Parrott and Stephen Hendry who would win this match and they dismissed Bingham's chances. They were dismissive of the fact Bingham is the current world champion and just assumed Higgins - with the better track record - was going to win. I'm glad they were proven wrong. It just goes to show great snooker players make lousy 'experts' when predicting winners! :-D


They probably forgot that Bingham won the WC, knowing them.


   

cron