John Higgins/Steve Davis
When determining the most successful (not greatest) players is this the barometer that most people/commentators use? My question is should it be?
For me it's the Triple Crown Events (including the Masters) + full ranking events. By that logic John is on 30 (I think) and Steve is on 33. Steve has won to date one extra Masters than John, and 2 of his UK wins were not ranking events (seems bizarre that these are not counted retrospectively).
- whitespider
- Posts: 91
- Joined: 22 January 2015