by TheRocket » 09 Feb 2015 Read
Which players (or which player) have the best A-game or peak-game, however you wanna call it. And try to make a ranking if you can.
O'Sullivan, Higgins and Hendry are at the top for me but it's really tough to choose between them. Hendry and O'Sullivan are huge scorers while Higgins is the best Allrounder the game has ever seen.
After that there are several players for me who are close to rank on the same level, like Williams, Trump, Ding, Robertson and Selby.
What do you think?
-
TheRocket
- Posts: 16430
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by Andre147 » 09 Feb 2015 Read
It's difficult to say, because on some players their A game relies more on potting ability, whereas other players their A game is a mix between good breakbuilding and safety play.
Nevertheless, I always thought Ronnie's A game when at his absolute best is the best there's ever been, no one can touch him if he's on song, and then obviously the fear factor comes in as well. Hendry comes in 2nd place, but then on 3rd place I can't really decide between Higgins or MJW because both have different styles of play that work on a given situation. I can't split these two.
As for the others, namely Robbo, Ding and Selby, Robbo for me has by far the best A game of those 3, for instance we saw at at this year's Masters against Carter or at last season's Worlds against Trump in the final session. Ding's A game for me is a cut above Selby as well.
All this is very subjective mind you, and there will be different opinions all around.
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41810
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by vodkadiet » 09 Feb 2015 Read
I have always found this topic irrelevant because it doesn't win you a tournament. in 2007 O'Sullivan hammered Carter in The Northern Ireland trophy making 4 or 5 centuries, and then lost next round.
-
vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings
by SnookerFan » 09 Feb 2015 Read
It's not difficult to say at all. It's Ronnie. Why is this even a debate?
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151044
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Holden Chinaski » 09 Feb 2015 Read
SnookerFan wrote:It's not difficult to say at all. It's Ronnie. Why is this even a debate?
Indeed.
-
Holden Chinaski
- Posts: 30215
- Joined: 26 July 2013
- Location: Belgium
- Snooker Idol: The Belgiums
- Walk-On: A little less conversation - Elvis
by Roland » 10 Feb 2015 Read
It's Ronnie. I've seen a very select few players play a perfect session of snooker (talking >6 frames) and Ronnie has done it more than anyone else.
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by vodkadiet » 10 Feb 2015 Read
A far better quality is being able to win when your back is against the wall. That is why I rate John Higgins in higher regard than Ronnie O'Sullivan. His victory at The Crucible in 2011 was the best performance ever. He beat O'Sullivan, Williams, and Trump all from at least 3 frames behind. And he beat them all by 3 frames.
Playing great when you are in great form without any resistance is not that admirable a quality.
-
vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings
by Sickpotter » 10 Feb 2015 Read
In terms of pretty play I'd go with Ronnie.
In terms of consistency and ruthlessness I'd go with Hendry.
In terms of all round game/match play HIggins gets the nod.
Hendry has IMO managed to play at his best for the better part of a decade, rarely losing the groove. I never saw that level of sustained consistency from either Ronnie or Higgins.
-
Sickpotter
- Posts: 1527
- Joined: 05 October 2009
- Location: Toronto
- Snooker Idol: White-Hendry-ROS
- Highest Break: 147
by Roland » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Higgins at his best could stop Ronnie at his best from playing at his best
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Cloud Strife » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Does mentality and temperant come into it?
If Hendry and O'Sullivan played each other whilst producing their A games, who of the two would be more prone to succumb to the pressure of such a matchup?
-
Cloud Strife
- Posts: 18566
- Joined: 28 January 2014
- Location: Antarctica
- Snooker Idol: Roger Federer
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Don Vedda - buck You
-
by Andre147 » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Cloud Strife wrote:Does mentality and temperant come into it?
If Hendry and O'Sullivan played each other whilst producing their A games, who of the two would be more prone to succumb to the pressure of such a matchup?
Probably Ronnie. But then again, for me when at his best he's the best ever, the difference being Ronnie can't sustain his best play as long as Hendry could do in his prime.
In a World Final and if both were playing their absolute A game and it went close, I would give Hendry a tad advantage simply because he could sustain it for longer, but as I said Ronnie's best is better than Hendry's.
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41810
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by AC or LT? » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Roland wrote:Higgins at his best could stop Ronnie at his best from playing at his best
Same with Selby.
-
AC or LT?
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: 30 April 2012
- Snooker Idol: Peter Ebdon
- Highest Break: 15
- Walk-On: http://147talk.boards.net/
-
by SnookerFan » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Cloud Strife wrote:Does mentality and temperant come into it?
If Hendry and O'Sullivan played each other whilst producing their A games, who of the two would be more prone to succumb to the pressure of such a matchup?
I would argue no. This thread is about when a player is playing at his best. Not how good is a person's b-game, or how good is their mental strength when they're not playing well.
Ronnie has the most natural talent in the game, and his best is better than any other player that has ever played the game. However, up until a couple of years ago his temperament was rubbish. If he wasn't up for a game, he'd take reckless shots on, not bother to try. He'd have people he could thrash easily beat him by wide margins.
That's not what we're talking about here. Because that's not his best.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151044
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Dan-cat » 10 Feb 2015 Read
"When Ronnie's on song, everybody else looks like a cart horse" Steve Davis
-
Dan-cat
- Posts: 31524
- Joined: 20 August 2013
- Location: Shoreditch, London
- Snooker Idol: The Rocket + The Nugget
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: www.instagram.com/dan_cat
-
by SnookerFan » 10 Feb 2015 Read
"When Ronnie is at his best, I have to cross my legs in the commentary box." John Virgo.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151044
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Dan-cat » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Hahahaha SF.
'When Ronnie is at his best, all I can do is repeat the phrase 'You are watching the best, at his best' ad nauseam' John Parrot
-
Dan-cat
- Posts: 31524
- Joined: 20 August 2013
- Location: Shoreditch, London
- Snooker Idol: The Rocket + The Nugget
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: www.instagram.com/dan_cat
-
by Holden Chinaski » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Ronnie at his absolute best, like in the 2005 Masters final for example, is just on another level. There's only one player Stephen Hendry would pay for to see, and that's ROS. Hendry's words not mine. Nuff said.
-
Holden Chinaski
- Posts: 30215
- Joined: 26 July 2013
- Location: Belgium
- Snooker Idol: The Belgiums
- Walk-On: A little less conversation - Elvis
by Wildey » 10 Feb 2015 Read
vodkadiet wrote:I have always found this topic irrelevant because it doesn't win you a tournament. in 2007 O'Sullivan hammered Carter in The Northern Ireland trophy making 4 or 5 centuries, and then lost next round.
yea you need to be at your best for a whole week or 2 weeks no point making breaks for fun in one match and play avarage next match and get beat.
John Higgins or Mark Selby can tough it out when they are strugling but if they came up against Ronnie playing at his best they will have to up their Game.
its irrelivant who can reach the pinacle of play its all about doing it consistently
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Holden Chinaski » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Wildey wrote:vodkadiet wrote:I have always found this topic irrelevant because it doesn't win you a tournament. in 2007 O'Sullivan hammered Carter in The Northern Ireland trophy making 4 or 5 centuries, and then lost next round.
yea you need to be at your best for a whole week or 2 weeks no point making breaks for fun in one match and play avarage next match and get beat.
John Higgins or Mark Selby can tough it out when they are strugling but if they came up against Ronnie playing at his best they will have to up their Game.
its irrelivant who can reach the pinacle of play its all about doing it consistently
But for players like Ronnie, Alex Higgins and Jimmy White for example, just winning titles is not enough. They want to win playing a certain kind of snooker. They want to play exciting, attacking and beautiful snooker. That's why they are the peoples champions.This thread is about who has the best A game, and in my opinion Ronnie has the best, followed by Hendry, John Higgins and Steve Davis.
-
Holden Chinaski
- Posts: 30215
- Joined: 26 July 2013
- Location: Belgium
- Snooker Idol: The Belgiums
- Walk-On: A little less conversation - Elvis
by whitespider » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Snooker is strange though as everybody's A-game produces the same result -
Attack wise
If your playing your best you pot a difficult red then clear the table (or put the frame beyond reach). All the top player's A game produces this result. You could argue even that the top amateurs also experience this from time to time. It's effectively a one shot kill. And you can't better that outcome. Sure some do it with flair, others not but the outcome is the same. Anyone in that sort of attacking form is capable of beating anybody even if the opposing players is in that form themselves. There is a question whether they hit it for one frame, several frames, a session or longer and that is what determines matches and tournaments, and how good a player is. But all your top players can reach and have some frames at this peak, creating something out of nothing and going on to win the frame. And if they sustain this form then there can be no seperation attack wise, in snooker results terms.
Defence wise
So with that in mind if you had two players potting at 97% (which is a realistic peak - Robbo at the Masters had this at one point in one match) the whole question comes down to the players defence and who is most likely to leave the opening red.
-
whitespider
- Posts: 91
- Joined: 22 January 2015
by vodkadiet » 10 Feb 2015 Read
Cloud Strife wrote:Does mentality and temperant come into it?
If Hendry and O'Sullivan played each other whilst producing their A games, who of the two would be more prone to succumb to the pressure of such a matchup?
O'Sullivan.
-
vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings