case_master wc wrote:Whilst I agree with Hearn’s plan I can understand why some are opposed.
The WPBSA have 4 million cash in the bank and then there is all their assets.
Now if they went looking for a private investor and willing to give away 50% they would be looking for 4-5 million in return (at least)
Whats good is 4 million in the bank and a sport dying on its ass.
Whats are they gonna do, wait till there are no tournaments left and snooker is totally dead then say " ah but nevermind about that, we now have 6 million pounds in the bank" !?!?! So here is the money split among you the 96 players and the WPSBA staff and would the last person please switch the lights off and close the door, SNOOKER IS DEAD.
By giving Hearn full control, this will be an investment in itself as he will increase income, revenue, resulting in more prize money for players which is better for them as they wont ever see any benefit from the coffers of the governing body, whether its WPSBA or Matchroom being healthy.
Prize Money is all the players can derive their earnings from so this should be the players key factor in deciding what way to vote !