by Roland » 05 May 2011 Read
You have 3 votes
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Rocket_ron » 05 May 2011 Read
i have voted
higgins v ronnie
trump v ding
higgins v trump
-
Rocket_ron
- Posts: 8307
- Joined: 27 December 2009
- Location: Chesterfield
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie Osullivan
- Highest Break: 43
-
by Witz78 » 05 May 2011 Read
no McLeod v Walden option
YOU RACIST
-
Witz78
- Posts: 15036
- Joined: 02 February 2010
by Roland » 06 May 2011 Read
Ding v Trump was the match of the tournament for me.
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Witz78 » 06 May 2011 Read
when you look at the "contenders" it actually becomes apparant that this WC was hyped up as there was a lot of dire matches
-
Witz78
- Posts: 15036
- Joined: 02 February 2010
by Roland » 06 May 2011 Read
Like you remember any of them
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Bourne » 06 May 2011 Read
Only voting ONCE since there can only be one match in a 'best match' poll lol ... and that is Trump vs Ding for so many reasons, but was also one of the most heartbreaking too.
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by Tubberlad » 06 May 2011 Read
Witz78 wrote:when you look at the "contenders" it actually becomes apparant that this WC was hyped up as there was a lot of dire matches
I thought it was easily the best since 2003, just a pity Higgins won it and not Trump
-
Tubberlad
- Posts: 5009
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: Ireland
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie OSullivan
- Highest Break: 49
by KrazeeEyezKilla » 06 May 2011 Read
I made a mistake and only voted for Trump-Ding but Allen-Stevens and Higgins-Trump would have got it as well. There were some poor matches but this year had the best final since 2005, the best pair of semi's since 2007 with Trump-Ding the best match at that stage since the early 2000's. Plus Trump & Allens runs made it a memorable year. With so much Snooker played theres always going to be a fair amount of crap but the good stuff this year was very good.
-
KrazeeEyezKilla
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: 16 November 2009
- Location: Ireland
- Highest Break: 26
- Walk-On: Dazz Band - Let It All Blow
by GJ » 06 May 2011 Read
trump v ding
-
GJ
- Posts: 28243
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by Wildey » 06 May 2011 Read
my 3 choices
Allen v Stevens
Ding v Trump
Higgins v Trump
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64326
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Casey » 06 May 2011 Read
Being front row for the last couple of frames in the Hendry v Perry match was pretty special for me.
I thought the two SF's were also brilliant.
-
Casey
- Posts: 8520
- Joined: 03 October 2009
- Location: Ireland
- Snooker Idol: Hendry Allen
by SnookerFan » 06 May 2011 Read
Trump vs Ding, probably.
I would say Higgins vs Trump, but was more then likely influenced by the fact I was there, which always adds to a match. That and the atmosphere.
It's hard to pick though, there were some good matches there. Even from the start. Even matches such as Jamie Cope vs Andrew Pagett, that you would expect to be jabronified were pretty good.
It was just a shame Rory McLeod was in the tournament.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 149873
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Witz78 » 06 May 2011 Read
surprised im the only one so far to go for Selby - Hendry. The quality of play from Wiggy was awesome
-
Witz78
- Posts: 15036
- Joined: 02 February 2010
by SnookerFan » 06 May 2011 Read
Witz78 wrote:surprised im the only one so far to go for Selby - Hendry. The quality of play from Wiggy was awesome
Yeah, Selby was on fire in that match. I actually thought he was a serious contender to win, based on that play. Though, however good it was to watch, I'm not sure an arse-drubbing of that proportion can be considered the best match of the tournament. However good it was to watch Selby's play.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 149873
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Wildey » 06 May 2011 Read
Witz78 wrote:surprised im the only one so far to go for Selby - Hendry. The quality of play from Wiggy was awesome
yes the play from selby was awsome but this thread is Best Match and that was a non evcent TBH
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64326
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Roland » 06 May 2011 Read
I enjoyed it but looking back the matches I enjoyed the most all involved Judd Trump.
Gould v Fu would've been my 4th choice
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by DavieMac » 07 May 2011 Read
Trump v Ding obviously. Im a bit of a daftie so i didnt use my other votes. Would've gone with the final and Gould v Fu.
-
DavieMac
- Posts: 674
- Joined: 19 February 2011
- Snooker Idol: Stephen Maguire
- Highest Break: 28
by SnookerFan » 07 May 2011 Read
KrazeeEyezKilla wrote:I made a mistake and only voted for Trump-Ding but Allen-Stevens and Higgins-Trump would have got it as well. There were some poor matches but this year had the best final since 2005, the best pair of semi's since 2007 with Trump-Ding the best match at that stage since the early 2000's. Plus Trump & Allens runs made it a memorable year. With so much Snooker played theres always going to be a fair amount of crap but the good stuff this year was very good.
I was sat here thinking; "That can't be true, there must've been some decent final since then." But it turns out, aside from the Higgins vs Selby final, which I thought was a cracking match, most of them have been duds. You had the classic that was Ebdon vs Dott, you had the one-sided Ronnie wins, and even the John Higgins vs Shaun Murphy match which should've been a blinder, ended up with Murphy choking the match big-school stylee. That's pretty depressing really. 2010 wasn't too bad, and had a new champion crowned. But was still a classic grind, and at getting on for 1am, many of us were happy it ended.
I had to work the next day.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 149873
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Witz78 » 07 May 2011 Read
Higgins - Selby wasnt a classic, it was more like the Robbo - Murphy and Allen - Higgins semis 2 year ago where someone went miles ahead, opponent made a good comeback but alas, it was in vain
-
Witz78
- Posts: 15036
- Joined: 02 February 2010
by Wildey » 07 May 2011 Read
Witz78 wrote:Higgins - Selby wasnt a classic, it was more like the Robbo - Murphy and Allen - Higgins semis 2 year ago where someone went miles ahead, opponent made a good comeback but alas, it was in vain
yes comeback matches are only classics if they go on to win.
comeback for nothing isnt a "classic" in my eyes.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64326
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by SnookerFan » 07 May 2011 Read
Wild wrote:Witz78 wrote:Higgins - Selby wasnt a classic, it was more like the Robbo - Murphy and Allen - Higgins semis 2 year ago where someone went miles ahead, opponent made a good comeback but alas, it was in vain
yes comeback matches are only classics if they go on to win.
comeback for nothing isnt a "classic" in my eyes.
I didn't say it was a classic, but labelling a comeback match a dud, just because the person making a comeback doesn't quite win is a bit silly.
I thought it was a good match, where Selby looked down and out, but on the second day it wasn't quite assured...
I wasn't liking it to Davis vs Taylor.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 149873
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Wildey » 07 May 2011 Read
SnookerFan wrote:Wild wrote:Witz78 wrote:Higgins - Selby wasnt a classic, it was more like the Robbo - Murphy and Allen - Higgins semis 2 year ago where someone went miles ahead, opponent made a good comeback but alas, it was in vain
yes comeback matches are only classics if they go on to win.
comeback for nothing isnt a "classic" in my eyes.
I didn't say it was a classic, but labelling a comeback match a dud, just because the person making a comeback doesn't quite win is a bit silly.
I thought it was a good match, where Selby looked down and out, but on the second day it wasn't quite assured...
I wasn't liking it to Davis vs Taylor.
yes i loved the grinding way Selby came back but the comeback finished just 1 or 2 frames to early to make it interesting in the end it was 18-13 the equivelant of a 5-0 in a best of 9 as higgins put the peddle to the mettle and raced home lol
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64326
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by SnookerFan » 07 May 2011 Read
Wild wrote:
yes i loved the grinding way Selby came back but the comeback finished just 1 or 2 frames to early to make it interesting in the end it was 18-13 the equivelant of a 5-0 in a best of 9 as higgins put the peddle to the mettle and raced home lol
Okay, I'm sorry. It was a rubbish match. I'm sorry I enjoyed it.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 149873
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Wildey » 07 May 2011 Read
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64326
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only