by Wildey » 05 Jan 2011 Read
HugoDrax wrote:someone better inform "bot" Cleaver that there is a contest
im sure the radar is on
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64455
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Wildey » 05 Jan 2011 Read
just in case someone is wandering i did not run High Break or Finalists with this because with only 15 matches and 16 Players that can make a big big difference to standings.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64455
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by GJ » 05 Jan 2011 Read
i will win this as im being unbiased in my predicts for proof look at my ronald prediction
-
GJ
- Posts: 28243
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by Bourne » 05 Jan 2011 Read
The only time you ever won a PC was when you were biased
So be biased
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by Wildey » 09 Jan 2011 Read
nobody went for a king win so its as we were lol
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64455
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Bourne » 09 Jan 2011 Read
Is the first time in PC history that the whole field have been wrong ?
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by Smart » 09 Jan 2011 Read
LeBourne wrote:Is the first time in PC history that the whole field have been wrong ?
-
Smart
- Posts: 25364
- Joined: 03 October 2009
- Location: Siberia
- Snooker Idol: JOE JOGIA
- Highest Break: 3
- Walk-On: http://snookerydookery.freeforums.net/
-
by Wildey » 09 Jan 2011 Read
only 3 out of 16 went for a Ebdon win
PL the Ref
Sunday Girl
Witz
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64455
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by GJ » 09 Jan 2011 Read
wildJONESEYE wrote:only 3 out of 16 went for a Ebdon win
PL the Ref
Sunday Girl
Witz
it will end 6-3 carter
mark my words
-
GJ
- Posts: 28243
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by PLtheRef » 09 Jan 2011 Read
wildJONESEYE wrote:only 3 out of 16 went for a Ebdon win
PL the Ref
Sunday Girl
Witz
And those three all confidently predicted Selby wins
-
PLtheRef
- Posts: 5080
- Joined: 20 December 2009
- Location: Sheffield
- Highest Break: 28
- Walk-On: Vangelis 1492 Conquest of Paradise
by Roland » 09 Jan 2011 Read
LeBourne wrote:Is the first time in PC history that the whole field have been wrong ?
There have been a few Matthew Stevens wins down the years where GJ was the only correct picker
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Bourne » 09 Jan 2011 Read
Sonny wrote:LeBourne wrote:Is the first time in PC history that the whole field have been wrong ?
There have been a few Matthew Stevens wins down the years where GJ was the only correct picker
Yeh that's what i'm saying, there've been upsets where GJ has been the only one to fluke his prediction like the Carter/Milkins or Allen/O'Sullivan etc, but I can't remember there being a whitewash
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by GJ » 09 Jan 2011 Read
LeBourne wrote:Sonny wrote:LeBourne wrote:Is the first time in PC history that the whole field have been wrong ?
There have been a few Matthew Stevens wins down the years where GJ was the only correct picker
Yeh that's what i'm saying, there've been upsets where GJ has been the only one to fluke his prediction like the Carter/Milkins or Allen/O'Sullivan etc, but I can't remember there being a whitewash
carter v milkins was no fluke carters wife had just ha a baby and milkins is quaity in the quick fire matches sometimes
-
GJ
- Posts: 28243
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by Bourne » 09 Jan 2011 Read
Even more funny when you try to justify it
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by Bourne » 10 Jan 2011 Read
Three complete luckers.
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by sundaygirl » 10 Jan 2011 Read
Bourne wrote:Three complete luckers.
Make that
four Peter definitely had the run of the ball.
-
sundaygirl
- Posts: 2627
- Joined: 27 September 2010
- Location: Bedfordshire
- Snooker Idol: Jack Lisowski
by Wildey » 10 Jan 2011 Read
sundaygirl wrote:Bourne wrote:Three complete luckers.
Make that
four Peter definitely had the run of the ball.
yes he got lucky to win but thats part of the game.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64455
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by PLtheRef » 10 Jan 2011 Read
I think we ought to call it a day for this contest :P
-
PLtheRef
- Posts: 5080
- Joined: 20 December 2009
- Location: Sheffield
- Highest Break: 28
- Walk-On: Vangelis 1492 Conquest of Paradise
by GJ » 10 Jan 2011 Read
ding
-
GJ
- Posts: 28243
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by sundaygirl » 10 Jan 2011 Read
Wild wrote:sundaygirl wrote:Bourne wrote:Three complete luckers.
Make that
four Peter definitely had the run of the ball.
yes he got lucky to win but thats part of the game.
I agree. A player has to take advantage while the luck is running in his favor and Peter is excellent at doing that, other players sometimes seem almost embarassed and fail to make the most of it.
-
sundaygirl
- Posts: 2627
- Joined: 27 September 2010
- Location: Bedfordshire
- Snooker Idol: Jack Lisowski
by Wildey » 10 Jan 2011 Read
after williams v ding
1 Witz = 11
2 AlexOpaul WC=8
2 Bourne=8
2 Kostasmad=8
5 PL the Ref=6
5 Sunday Girl=6
7 GJ=5
7 Smart=5
7 The Cleaver=5
10 CaseMaster=0
10 Jade=0
10 John From London Town=0
10 KrazeeEyezKilla=0
10 Randam=0
10 Sonny=0
10 Wild=0
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64455
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by randam05 » 10 Jan 2011 Read
This is shocking predictions..well you cant blame me and jade for predicting carter and selby as winners though! and williams seemed to be favourite for me..so all of us on 0 havent done anything wrong.
-
randam05
- Posts: 4965
- Joined: 18 August 2010
- Location: Devon
- Snooker Idol: Dominic Dale
- Highest Break: 114
- Walk-On: Simply Red - Stars
-
by Witz78 » 10 Jan 2011 Read
Bourne wrote:Three complete luckers.
i had 100% faith in my main man Ebdo
-
Witz78
- Posts: 15036
- Joined: 02 February 2010
by Witz78 » 10 Jan 2011 Read
Wild wrote:after williams v ding
1 Witz = 11
2 AlexOpaul WC=8
2 Bourne=8
2 Kostasmad=8
5 PL the Ref=6
5 Sunday Girl=6
7 GJ=5
7 Smart=5
7 The Cleaver=5
10 CaseMaster=0
10 Jade=0
10 John From London Town=0
10 KrazeeEyezKilla=0
10 Randam=0
10 Sonny=0
10 Wild=0
Thats why ive never entered these contests before, thought id better let some of yous experience a win in it before i started a period of prediction dominance
-
Witz78
- Posts: 15036
- Joined: 02 February 2010
by Bourne » 10 Jan 2011 Read
Looks like it's my duty to save this forum and stop Witz from winning, lot of pressure on my shoulders but i'm up for it
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by PLtheRef » 10 Jan 2011 Read
Well why not have a coalition, working in the forums interest. Bourne, you gimmee your 8, for good leadership
-
PLtheRef
- Posts: 5080
- Joined: 20 December 2009
- Location: Sheffield
- Highest Break: 28
- Walk-On: Vangelis 1492 Conquest of Paradise