Dan-cat wrote:Is Judd an all time great?
He's nearly caught Davis on rankers.
BUT
TCs.
Yeah, that's pretty much it. It's all about the World Championships with Judd.
Comparing different eras can be tough. The whole "achievements beat opinion every time" doesn't necessarily ring true every time, because, for example, you can state that Davis doesn't compare to modern players because he's only made 338 century breaks in his career. A career that spanned decades. This is a nonsense comparison, because in the 1980s, when Davis was at his pomp, people didn't play for centuries. They would play safe unless a pot was pretty much as close to being 100% chance of going in as possible.
The same with comparing ranking events.Some eras have had more ranking events than others, so that has to be also taken into account when comparing a modern player, with a player from a different generation. Hell, it wasn't that long ago, when we only had six ranking events a season.
Even comparing UK Championship wins, one could argue that the format is so different to what it was in Davis' time. We can't say it's been devalued, and then says a person winning the UK Championship now is the same as in the 1980s. (Granted Davis still has more than Trump. I use that just as an example.)
Does Judd dominate now, like Davis did? No. Is it a stronger era now, than in the 1980s? No disrespect to former players, but yes it is. And Judd still goes through phases of winning a lot. So, does he win there? Or does Davis' domination count?
The real question is, what's the constant? The Crucible. The format hasn't really changed at all since it started in the late 1970s. The venue hasn't changed. It's still the biggest test in the game, and still the marquee event.
I'm not saying that Trump has to win six for the comparison to Davis to be valid. But he has to win more than one.