Post a reply

Re: Matchroom.Live English Open Semi-Finals!!!

Postby Ck147

SnookerFan wrote:Looks like Quest aren't putting Gold Divers on.

They're usually pretty good when it gets to the latter stages of tournaments. Early rounds they stop dead at a key point.

Fluke for Robbo

Re: Matchroom.Live English Open Semi-Finals!!!

Postby SnookerFan

Juddernaut88 wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:Remember that 4-0 match, that ended 6-4?


I can't to be honest. Please remind me.


2012 UK Championship. (That was Google aiding my memory, by the way.)

Robertson was 4-0 up at the mid-session ans lost 6-4.

Re: Matchroom.Live English Open Semi-Finals!!!

Postby HustleKing

Iranu wrote:
HustleKing wrote:Shouldn't Higgins be the flukiest player, considering how many bank shots he pots?

How is that luck?


I guess it's a matter of opinion, but personally I think those shots require luck (at least on a snooker table), unless the object ball is hovering over a pocket

Re: Matchroom.Live English Open Semi-Finals!!!

Postby SnookerFan

Juddernaut88 wrote:Shhh Judd doesn't get many flukes these days. He had 1 yesterday but that was first all tournament and he also didn't get any in the European Masters.


Yeah, it's still Trump.

Re: Matchroom.Live English Open Semi-Finals!!!

Postby Iranu

HustleKing wrote:
Iranu wrote:
HustleKing wrote:Shouldn't Higgins be the flukiest player, considering how many bank shots he pots?

How is that luck?


I guess it's a matter of opinion, but personally I think those shots require luck (at least on a snooker table), unless the object ball is hovering over a pocket

Bank shots are doubles, right? How can a ball be over the pocket on a double?

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Higgins doubles game comes and goes with his general form. He’s the best in the world at judging doubles, I don’t think it’s luck at all.