Iranu wrote:So now it’s “in a final”? Convenient change of criteria, there.
What does peak have to do with the other player? Isn’t your peak game all about the best you can play regardless of opponent?
Only three players have made more centuries in a match than Selby, and two of those had an extra session to do so. Only 5 players have made more centuries in their careers than Selby.
I’m no huge fan of Selby’s but you’re speaking like a child.
Yeah just like how convenient it was for you to give examples of Selby smashing up Ronnie and Judd too and no that's not peak level snooker. Peak level snooker is when you're making tons of breaks, playing flawless snooker and keeping your opponent sat in his seat against the greats of the game that makes you go "wow, he blitzed his opponent with imperious play"
Selby doesn't do that. He's the only great of the game that doesn't do that. Judd has done it, Ronnie has done it, Higgins has done it, Hendry, Williams all have done it, but Selby? He's always struggling and putting balls to the cushion because he wished he has 10% of the talent the other greats have.
You're a Selby fan you're not fooling anyone lol we had this debate last time before I got banned and you come to Selby's defense ALL THE TIME