China Open 2013 Prediction Contest

Thursday 28th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
5-3 Jack Lisowski v Mark Davis
2-5 Ricky Walden v Mark Selby
1-5 Rory McLeod v Shaun Murphy
4-5 Mark Williams v Allister Carter

Deadline 11.29am GMT
5-3 Stephen Maguire v Barry Hawkins
5-2 Stuart Bingham v Robert Milkins
2-5 Marcus Campbell v Graeme Dott
4-5 Mark Allen v Neil Robertson

Thursday 28th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
5-3 Jack Lisowski v Mark Davis
5-3 Ricky Walden v Mark Selby
2-5 Rory McLeod v Shaun Murphy
5-2 Mark Williams v Allister Carter

Deadline 11.29am GMT
4-5 Stephen Maguire v Barry Hawkins
3-5 Stuart Bingham v Robert Milkins
5-3 Marcus Campbell v Graeme Dott
4-5 Mark Allen v Neil Robertson

Thursday 28th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
5-3 Jack Lisowski v Mark Davis
2-5 Ricky Walden v Mark Selby
3-5 Rory McLeod v Shaun Murphy
5-3 Mark Williams v Allister Carter

Deadline 11.29am GMT
5-3 Stephen Maguire v Barry Hawkins
5-3 Stuart Bingham v Robert Milkins
3-5 Marcus Campbell v Graeme Dott
5-3 Mark Allen v Neil Robertson

Thursday 28th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
5-3 Jack Lisowski v Mark Davis
3-5 Ricky Walden v Mark Selby
3-5 Rory McLeod v Shaun Murphy
2-5 Mark Williams v Allister Carter

Deadline 11.29am GMT
5-3 Stephen Maguire v Barry Hawkins
4-5 Stuart Bingham v Robert Milkins
2-5 Marcus Campbell v Graeme Dott
5-4 Mark Allen v Neil Robertson

Thursday 28th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
5-4 Jack Lisowski v Mark Davis
4-5 Ricky Walden v Mark Selby
5-4 Rory McLeod v Shaun Murphy
5-4 Mark Williams v Allister Carter

Deadline 11.29am GMT
4-5 Stephen Maguire v Barry Hawkins
5-4 Stuart Bingham v Robert Milkins
5-4 Marcus Campbell v Graeme Dott
4-5 Mark Allen v Neil Robertson

Thursday 28th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
5-3 Jack Lisowski v Mark Davis
2-5 Ricky Walden v Mark Selby
2-5 Rory McLeod v Shaun Murphy
3-5 Mark Williams v Allister Carter

Deadline 11.29am GMT
5-2 Stephen Maguire v Barry Hawkins
5-4 Stuart Bingham v Robert Milkins
4-5 Marcus Campbell v Graeme Dott
5-4 Mark Allen v Neil Robertson

  ▲▼JEWELL↓
Re: China Open 2013 Prediction Contest
Today, 16:29
Friday 29th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
4-5Jack Lisowski v Shaun Murphy
3-5 Mark Williams v Mark Selby

Deadline 11.29am GMT
2-5 Marcus Campbell v Neil Robertson
5-3 Stephen Maguire v Stuart Bingham

Friday 29th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
4-5 Jack Lisowski v Shaun Murphy
2-5 Mark Williams v Mark Selby

Deadline 11.29am GMT
0-5 Marcus Campbell v Neil Robertson
5-3 Stephen Maguire v Stuart Bingham

Friday 29th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
4-5 Jack Lisowski v Shaun Murphy
2-5 Mark Williams v Mark Selby

Deadline 11.29am GMT
0-5 Marcus Campbell v Neil Robertson
5-3 Stephen Maguire v Stuart Bingham

Friday 29th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
5-4 Jack Lisowski v Shaun Murphy
3-5 Mark Williams v Mark Selby

Deadline 11.29am GMT
2-5 Marcus Campbell v Neil Robertson
5-3 Stephen Maguire v Stuart Bingham

Friday 29th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
5-3 Jack Lisowski v Shaun Murphy
5-3 Mark Williams v Mark Selby

Deadline 11.29am GMT
2-5 Marcus Campbell v Neil Robertson
2-5 Stephen Maguire v Stuart Bingham

Friday 29th March Template

Deadline 6.29am GMT
4-5 Jack Lisowski v Shaun Murphy
3-5 Mark Williams v Mark Selby

Deadline 11.29am GMT
2-5 Marcus Campbell v Neil Robertson
5-4 Stephen Maguire v Stuart Bingham

I see SKULLMAN never predicted for the QFs. Very strange. Rules are rules though.

Smart wrote:I see SKULLMAN never predicted for the QFs. Very strange. Rules are rules though.

yes rules have to apply to everyone we cant have inconsistencies when it suits the TD

GJ wrote:

Smart wrote:I see SKULLMAN never predicted for the QFs. Very strange. Rules are rules though.

yes rules have to apply to everyone we cant have inconsistencies when it suits the TD

feels like cheating to me, I'm very dissapointed in how this is been run

Jewell wrote:

Smart wrote:feels like parakeeting to me, I'm very dissapointed in how this is been run

You concerns have been duly noted.

those predictions you have lodged for someone else should clearly be null and void

very poor indeed

I withdraw you cant have td predicting on behalf of others

SHAMBLES

Jewell wrote:

GJ wrote:I withdraw you cant have td predicting on behalf of others

SHAMBLES

Bye.

now look what you have done rat jewll......people are sick of these inconsistent and cheating TDs

GJ wrote:I withdraw you cant have td predicting on behalf of others

SHAMBLES

Or you predicted both quarters wrong and know you can't win so are withdrawing and pretending the only reason you haven't won was because of Jewell's 'poor decisions'.

so its ok to bad mouth TD rexy who used clear rules

but an inconsistent td gets backed by you

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Skullman wrote:

GJ wrote:I withdraw you cant have td predicting on behalf of others

SHAMBLES

Or you predicted both quarters wrong and know you can't win so are withdrawing and pretending the only reason you haven't won was because of Jewell's 'poor decisions'.

skullman

you never predicted for the QFs and yet that slimey rat Jewell is giving you points, that is disgusting and the poorest decision I have seen in all my years of contests. Totally against fair play and totally against the spirit of good sportmanship. You and rat Jewell should be thoroughly ashamed of your actions.

i hope pad is consistent and awards half points for this farce

GJ wrote:i hope pad is consistent and awards half points for this farce

Jewell wrote:We've had the minimum ten entrants so normal points will be allocated.

td rexy had minimum entrants as well

half points awarded

pad is a ref he will be fair here and CONSISTENT

But with a withdrawal, we'll have less than ten, which puts us in the same boat as the PTC Grands, which started with >10, ended with less and got half points.

Skullman wrote:But with a withdrawal, we'll have less than ten, which puts us in the same boat as the PTC Grands, which started with >10, ended with less and got half points.

Jewell wrote:I still haven't decided whether or not I will accept GJs withdrawal request.

IF NOT I WILL LODGE AN OFFICIAL COMPLAINT TO PAD