Pink Ball wrote:Not really sure why I’ve gotten so much hate for being vocal about thinking The Masters is overrated. It’s an opinion. Not necessarily correct, but that’s what forums are about.
This week we’ve heard BadSnookerPlayer claim Selbys peak is better than Sullivan’s. I think that a far more outrageous, but I have shown nothing but respect for his idiot trumper analysis.
Claiming Selby's peak is better than ROS is not outrageous, just plain stupid really. Maybe Selby's safety play is better, but overall Ronnie's A game is much stronger.
As for your opinion about The Masters, of course it's your opinion and I respect it. I for one think it's one of the hardest events to win, because only the elite players win it (ok Perry Mans excluded
) and it has had some of the best ever Finals I've ever seen in Snooker, and the standard in them was insane.
I would rate The Masters above the UK now because it has kept a similar format since it began. Hendry always used to rate it as his 2nd favourite tournament.