BetVictor English Open Quarter Finals !!

Iranu wrote:Just because he doesn't normally do it, that doesn't mean it wasn't deliberate this time. Anything can happen in the heat of battle.

Honestly, the mental gymnastics of my fellow Ronnie fans in attempt to absolve him of blame is almost as disappointing as the incident itself.

Stop with this "I'm not sure", "it's not conclusive". I mean I get it, it's hard to accept when your fvourite player does something like this. But he did.

He cheated.

Accept it. Support him from now if you wish. I probably will. But don't claim he didn't parakeet.

Iranu wrote:Just because he doesn't normally do it, that doesn't mean it wasn't deliberate this time. Anything can happen in the heat of battle.

Honestly, the mental gymnastics of my fellow Ronnie fans in attempt to absolve him of blame is almost as disappointing as the incident itself.

Stop with this "I'm not sure", "it's not conclusive". I mean I get it, it's hard to accept when your fvourite player does something like this. But he did.

He cheated.

Accept it. Support him from now if you wish. I probably will. But don't claim he didn't parakeet.

Andre147 wrote:By the way, some of you may not know, but the marker SHOULD have stopped the game immediatly because he has acess to replays and as soon as he saw the foul, he should have told the ref and claim the foul.

The marker is also at fault here, more than the referee herself.

SnookerFan wrote:It's not letting me view the video.

Do we definitely think it was deliberate?

SnookerFan wrote:It's not letting me view the video.

Do we definitely think it was deliberate?

SnookerFan wrote:This what we're discussing, right?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aH_Esz9qHRU

Ronnie could retire tomorrow, and I wouldn't miss him. But on first glance, that looks accidental to me.

masterdoctorgenius wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:It's not letting me view the video.

Do we definitely think it was deliberate?

you are there. ask ronnie himself.

masterdoctorgenius wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:It's not letting me view the video.

Do we definitely think it was deliberate?

you are there. ask ronnie himself.

Cloud Strife wrote:

masterdoctorgenius wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:It's not letting me view the video.

Do we definitely think it was deliberate?

you are there. ask ronnie himself.

Maybe be can go bang on Ronnie's hotel room door. Demand some answers from him.

Badsnookerplayer wrote:I see you baby (shaking that ass)

Cloud Strife wrote:

masterdoctorgenius wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:It's not letting me view the video.

Do we definitely think it was deliberate?

you are there. ask ronnie himself.

Maybe be can go bang on Ronnie's hotel room door. Demand some answers from him.

Badsnookerplayer wrote:SF - can you get Mark Davis' autograph?

SnookerFan wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:SF - can you get Mark Davis' autograph?

I think I got it in my old book.

Iranu wrote:

Cloud Strife wrote:

masterdoctorgenius wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:It's not letting me view the video.

Do we definitely think it was deliberate?

you are there. ask ronnie himself.

Maybe be can go bang on Ronnie's hotel room door. Demand some answers from him.

"Oi Ronnie! Open up!

I need to know!

The internet needs to know!

...

Tirs or ass?"

SnookerFan wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:I see you baby (shaking that ass)

Sorry, I'll close the curtain.

Badsnookerplayer wrote:Fair play Vodka. I know you are not a Ronnie fan but you make a rational point. He cheated but he is human as we all are. Let it not ruin his legacy.

Wildey wrote:For the Record as someone thats done exactly what Ronnies done the fact he was with the rest and trying to move it out of the way he would not have felt it. it so different to playing with a bridge hand the clinking of the cue on ball could easily be the clinking of cue on rest head.

Badsnookerplayer wrote:

Wildey wrote:For the Record as someone thats done exactly what Ronnies done the fact he was with the rest and trying to move it out of the way he would not have felt it. it so different to playing with a bridge hand the clinking of the cue on ball could easily be the clinking of cue on rest head.

Honourable to defend him but he knew. The second look when he feels it makes that clear. Dissapointing that he would parakeet but not the worst thing he has done I agree.

Cloud Strife wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:This what we're discussing, right?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aH_Esz9qHRU

Ronnie could retire tomorrow, and I wouldn't miss him. But on first glance, that looks accidental to me.

It's not so much the act itself that is the issue. It's the fact that he didn't own up to it that is causing the consternation. The general consensus is that he must surely have known he touched the red.