Post a reply

Re: Betfred World Championship SF 2:John Higgins v Barry Haw

Postby Dannyboy

The Herminator wrote:Probably not a popular opinion but I think semis should be best of 29 or 31. Seems weird that they are virtually same length as the final, and seen plenty of players get to the final already exhausted.

I'd put it back to 31, but it reduces one of the sessions back to 7 frames which isn't really fair on the paying punter.

Re: Betfred World Championship SF 2:John Higgins v Barry Haw

Postby SnookerEd25

The Herminator wrote:Probably not a popular opinion but I think semis should be best of 29 or 31. Seems weird that they are virtually same length as the final, and seen plenty of players get to the final already exhausted.


They used to be BO31. Don't know why they changed it really.

Re: Betfred World Championship SF 2:John Higgins v Barry Haw

Postby Andre147

Souvent wrote:I miss my favourite player (MJW) so much...


SHould have won at least 1 more World... he had that chance in 2011 but let Higgins back in the match when he led it... I think he could have beaten Trump.. we'll never know, but he would have been in the Final with a chance.

Re: Betfred World Championship SF 2:John Higgins v Barry Haw

Postby SnookerEd25

hendry_fan wrote:
SnookerEd25 wrote:
Chalk McHugh wrote:Does anyone else find Bazzer Hawkins boring to watch?


No, but I do find Higgins dull. Sorry, HendryFan.


Loved peak Hendry though; the original beast!




:shock: :grrr: :box:


:-D