Betfred World Championship Final: Ding Junhui v Mark Selby

hendry_fan wrote:A belated verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry well done to Mark on becoming the snooker world champion 2016 and in becomin it for the 2nd time.


I unfortunatley did,nt see the whole of the last session,but i,ll catch up with it on youtube over the next few days.



He did,nt half step up when it really counted,finished off the match in style.



It won,t be much of a consolation,but congrats to Ding on gettin as far as the final.


He really lost it already after the first session,losing the first 6 frames was a maaaaassive body blow,he recovered extremly well and managed to reduce the deficit to only 1 at one point,only to have to take another good few blows which lead to a 14-18 loss in the end.





Oh,i amost forgot,he did,nt manage to beat Hendrys century record.

Before the final,i was very nervous that he would either equal or beat it,as he was on 12,but luckily he <only> managed to knock in 3 more,funnily enough,all of them being exactly *103*.



His crackin barrage of centurys now puts him in second place on the all time list.

http://cuetracker.net/Statistics/Centur ... r/Crucible

1)Hendry=16
2)Ding=15
3)Higgins=14.







MARK SELBY!.

Sickpotter wrote:

hendry_fan wrote:A belated verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry well done to Mark on becoming the snooker world champion 2016 and in becomin it for the 2nd time.


I unfortunatley did,nt see the whole of the last session,but i,ll catch up with it on youtube over the next few days.



He did,nt half step up when it really counted,finished off the match in style.



It won,t be much of a consolation,but congrats to Ding on gettin as far as the final.


He really lost it already after the first session,losing the first 6 frames was a maaaaassive body blow,he recovered extremly well and managed to reduce the deficit to only 1 at one point,only to have to take another good few blows which lead to a 14-18 loss in the end.





Oh,i amost forgot,he did,nt manage to beat Hendrys century record.

Before the final,i was very nervous that he would either equal or beat it,as he was on 12,but luckily he <only> managed to knock in 3 more,funnily enough,all of them being exactly *103*.



His crackin barrage of centurys now puts him in second place on the all time list.

http://cuetracker.net/Statistics/Centur ... r/Crucible

1)Hendry=16
2)Ding=15
3)Higgins=14.







MARK SELBY!.

I'm curious, how many of Ding's tons came in qualifying rounds?

Pretty sure Hendry didn't play qualifiers when he set his 16 record but I could be mistaken.

Alex0paul wrote:Can't see Robertson winning again. He will be 35 at next years Championship

GJ wrote:Every winner since 2007 has been over 30 so I think it would be foolish to write off robbo.

He did win 2 of the biggest events pre Christmas so that shows he's still capable.

GJ wrote:Muppet

They both backed up their win over robbo well , no one could say they fluked it or got lucky .....

GJ wrote:Every winner since 2007 has been over 30 so I think it would be foolish to write off robbo.

He did win 2 of the biggest events pre Christmas so that shows he's still capable.

GJ wrote:Every winner since 2007 has been over 30 so I think it would be foolish to write off robbo.

He did win 2 of the biggest events pre Christmas so that shows he's still capable.

GJ wrote:Every winner since 2007 has been over 30 so I think it would be foolish to write off robbo.

He did win 2 of the biggest events pre Christmas so that shows he's still capable.

Clara8633 wrote:

GJ wrote:Every winner since 2007 has been over 30 so I think it would be foolish to write off robbo.

He did win 2 of the biggest events pre Christmas so that shows he's still capable.

I think Robertson is more likely to win a 2nd world title than Ding is to win his first.

Muppet147 wrote:

Clara8633 wrote:

GJ wrote:Every winner since 2007 has been over 30 so I think it would be foolish to write off robbo.

He did win 2 of the biggest events pre Christmas so that shows he's still capable.

I think Robertson is more likely to win a 2nd world title than Ding is to win his first.

If he can just get through to the second round...

SnookerFan wrote:Where's Dan-Cat? Not seen him all day.

Roland wrote:Mark Selby is a phenomenal snooker player

Holden Chinaski wrote:

Roland wrote:Mark Selby is a phenomenal snooker player

You are a cockwomble.

Womble wrote:

Holden Chinaski wrote:

Roland wrote:Mark Selby is a phenomenal snooker player

You are a cockwomble.

Someone resurrects an almost seven year old thread just to call someone a cockwomble. That's very flattering for me.

RunningSide wrote:

Womble wrote:

Holden Chinaski wrote:

Roland wrote:Mark Selby is a phenomenal snooker player

You are a cockwomble.

Someone resurrects an almost seven year old thread just to call someone a cockwomble. That's very flattering for me.

It's usually expected for new Islanders to give some information about themselves, snooker interest,private life ect,this my give other options to cockwomble, thanks.

SnookerFan wrote:

RunningSide wrote:

Womble wrote:

Holden Chinaski wrote:

Roland wrote:Mark Selby is a phenomenal snooker player

You are a cockwomble.

Someone resurrects an almost seven year old thread just to call someone a cockwomble. That's very flattering for me.

It's usually expected for new Islanders to give some information about themselves, snooker interest,private life ect,this my give other options to cockwomble, thanks.

How personal are you wanting the information to be?

"I currently got diagnosed with an STD."

SnookerEd25 wrote:
Sorry to hear, SF

Hope you’re out & about soon

SnookerFan wrote:

RunningSide wrote:

Womble wrote:

Holden Chinaski wrote:

Roland wrote:Mark Selby is a phenomenal snooker player

You are a cockwomble.

Someone resurrects an almost seven year old thread just to call someone a cockwomble. That's very flattering for me.

It's usually expected for new Islanders to give some information about themselves, snooker interest,private life ect,this my give other options to cockwomble, thanks.

How personal are you wanting the information to be?

"I currently got diagnosed with an STD."

SnookerFan wrote:

RunningSide wrote:

Womble wrote:

Holden Chinaski wrote:

Roland wrote:Mark Selby is a phenomenal snooker player

You are a cockwomble.

Someone resurrects an almost seven year old thread just to call someone a cockwomble. That's very flattering for me.

It's usually expected for new Islanders to give some information about themselves, snooker interest,private life ect,this my give other options to cockwomble, thanks.

How personal are you wanting the information to be?

"I currently got diagnosed with an STD."

chengdufan wrote:Womble isn't new though, is he. I think we all recognise the writing style

RunningSide wrote:

chengdufan wrote:Womble isn't new though, is he. I think we all recognise the writing style

Not everyone, Giss a clue.

chengdufan wrote:

RunningSide wrote:

chengdufan wrote:Womble isn't new though, is he. I think we all recognise the writing style

Not everyone, Giss a clue.

He seems especially interested in Yan Bingtao's suspension, almost as if he used to be a fan of Yan.

chengdufan wrote:

RunningSide wrote:

chengdufan wrote:Womble isn't new though, is he. I think we all recognise the writing style

Not everyone, Giss a clue.

He seems especially interested in Yan Bingtao's suspension, almost as if he used to be a fan of Yan.