Post a reply

Re: 888.com World Grand Prix Final Discussion !!!

Postby Skullman

Wildey wrote:
Skullman wrote:Surprised no one's suggested a rerack yet.

Why?

that was never ever a re rack candidate


Just the way things are done these days. Suppose scores were too high.

Re: 888.com World Grand Prix Final Discussion !!!

Postby Wildey

Skullman wrote:
Wildey wrote:
Skullman wrote:Surprised no one's suggested a rerack yet.

Why?

that was never ever a re rack candidate


Just the way things are done these days. Suppose scores were too high.

yea they are far too quick for suggesting re racks these days.....they miss out on so many interesting exchanges.

Re: 888.com World Grand Prix Final Discussion !!!

Postby Cloud Strife

SnookerFan wrote:Re-Racks should get banned anyway. Make them sort out any problem through quality of play.


Sometimes that is not possible if players are only intent on rolling up to the pack.

Re: 888.com World Grand Prix Final Discussion !!!

Postby Wildey

SnookerFan wrote:Re-Racks should get banned anyway. Make them sort out any problem through quality of play.

Absolutely

Re: 888.com World Grand Prix Final Discussion !!!

Postby Cloud Strife

Wildey wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:Re-Racks should get banned anyway. Make them sort out any problem through quality of play.

Absolutely


Some of Mark Selby's matches would never end if they banned re-racks.

Re: 888.com World Grand Prix Final Discussion !!!

Postby vodkadiet

SnookerFan wrote:Re-Racks should get banned anyway. Make them sort out any problem through quality of play.


There was a frame in the 1981 World final that had a re-rack with just blue, pink, and black on the table. I would like to see that happen again!!

Re: 888.com World Grand Prix Final Discussion !!!

Postby vodkadiet

If O'Sullivan goes 3 frames ahead, there will be no Trump comeback this time. I am seeing a 10-4 for O'Sullivan. Trump is lacking belief.