BetVictor Welsh Open Last 16 Discussion !!

Skullman wrote:Rerack.

For the record, Carter started the tip tapping.

i do feel that needed saying

Which is why I said it. It did go into the pack because of Selby's shot but that was due to a double kiss which Mark had no control over.

Skullman wrote:Which is why I said it. It did go into the pack because of Selby's shot but that was due to a double kiss which Mark had no control over.

ive always thought Carter is one of the most negative players on tour and he is escaping criticism.

Stuart Bingham 2-2 Joe Perry

Wildey wrote:Stuart Bingham 2-2 Joe Perry

Stuart was behind in most of his matches so far, wasn't he? But he always seems to find a way of leveling the score.

Poor standard in the Selby - Carter match so far.

Carter just isn't taking his chances today.

Never saw what all the fuss is about with selby and reracks tbh. Seems to make some people crazy.

Snooker Overdrive wrote:

Wildey wrote:Stuart Bingham 2-2 Joe Perry

Stuart was behind in most of his matches so far, wasn't he? But he always seems to find a way of leveling the score.

Not really that far behind. He was 1-0 behind against Un-Nooh, and only 2-1 behind to Holt at worst. This match is the worse off he's been.

It's hard to be too far behind in a best of 7, only 3-1 or 3-0 is really that bad in this format.

Ali is handing it to Mark.....some pretty bad decisions out there! Dang, thought he would win too.

3-1 Selby.

Have to say, Selby has been very fortunate that none of his opponents have really turned up yet.

Both players not playing well. However Selby is always going to win these type of matches.

Skullman wrote:

Snooker Overdrive wrote:

Wildey wrote:Stuart Bingham 2-2 Joe Perry

Stuart was behind in most of his matches so far, wasn't he? But he always seems to find a way of leveling the score.

Not really that far behind. He was 1-0 behind against Un-Nooh, and only 2-1 behind to Holt at worst. This match is the worse off he's been.

It's hard to be too far behind in a best of 7, only 3-1 or 3-0 is really that bad in this format.

Snooker Overdrive wrote:Both players not playing well. However Selby is always going to win these type of matches.

another 3 no show and hes champion

Ali looks on edge....almost like he just wants the match to end, one way or another.....

Mark's makes a good break to finish though

Perry or Bingo next, Joe back in front there at 3-2.

almost time for the rocket to launch!

Skullman wrote:Mark's makes a good break to finish though

Perry or Bingo next, Joe back in front there at 3-2.

Come on Bingo!

I feel like I just watched two club players. Very poor standard. Let's hope the match between Ronnie and Walden will be better.

Allister Carter 1-4 Mark Selby
Stuart Bingham 2-3 Joe Perry

Afternoon everyone

Decider alert Perry v Bingo

Hopefully Bingo takes it.

Stuart Bingham 3-3 Joe Perry

Watched the Selby v Carter match and although the standard wasn't high, Selby so far in this tournament has been making the most off his chances and although he's often not winning frames in one visit he then puts his opponent in loads of trouble and his safety has been pretty good too.

I feel he'll get more dangerous as the tournament goes on and he'll be hard to beat this week.

I think maybe only Ding or Ronnie will stop him from winning this title.

Stephen Maguire v Joel Walker

Scott Donaldson v Ding Junhui

Judd Trump v John Higgins




Wow,3 Scots still in it.I used to quite like Ding but since he,s got a chance to equal Hendrys record of winnin 5 titles in a season,i obviously want the shrimp to lose.



Would be crackin if auld John could beat Trump today,it,s high time that he pulled out some wizardy again.



Walker has had a brilliant run by his standards but i,m sure Maguire will end it.

hendry-fan forgot to ask you something the other day, this hasn't much to do with this topic but wanted to ask you:

Were you always a Hendry fan when he started dominating the game at the beggining of the 90s? I ask this because sometimes fans of legends of the game were not always fans of them because I know for instance a lot weren't fans of Steve Davis when he was dominating the game, there is sometimes that feeling that if a player starts dominating the sport like Davis or Hendry did in some fans "view" it becomes dull and boring and they want to see more variety. Only when their past their peak do some fans realise the greatness of the things they achieve, so having said all this were you always a Hendry fan or a bit later in his career?

Perry looks to be booking a quarter final against Mark Selby

Cmon Bingo, win the decider with a clearance.

Bingo can win by one point.

CMON

Andre147 PGC wrote:hendry-fan forgot to ask you something the other day, this hasn't much to do with this topic but wanted to ask you:

Were you always a Hendry fan when he started dominating the game at the beggining of the 90s? I ask this because sometimes fans of legends of the game were not always fans of them because I know for instance a lot weren't fans of Steve Davis when he was dominating the game, there is sometimes that feeling that if a player starts dominating the sport like Davis or Hendry did in some fans "view" it becomes dull and boring and they want to see more variety. Only when their past their peak do some fans realise the greatness of the things they achieve, so having said all this were you always a Hendry fan or a bit later in his career?

i know that question wasent for me but in early 90s i was a Jimmy White fan and wanted him to win the 1990 and 1992 final against Hendry but the way Hendry came back in 1992 to beat Jimmy that's when i became a Stephen Hendry fan.

he was a awesome player.

Bingo breaks down on the green, but has probably laid a snooker. Still needs all the colours to win.