Some pointless statistics about the Masters
So, in the lead up to the Masters I’m going to post some random statistics I’ve accrued when I’m bored. I doubt many of them will lead to anything but they might be interesting for the statistically minded.
So here’s the first, showing how well the reigning UK Champion does in the Masters historically. Now with graphs! The one for the last fifteen years shows a more recent trend and also excludes Hendry era, because he tended to skew the graph more towards the winner’s end.
Note: N/A refers to UK champions who either didn’t play in Masters that year, e.g. Doug Mountjoy in 1989 and Ding in 2006, or lost in the wildcard round that year e.g. ROS in 1994.
So here’s the first, showing how well the reigning UK Champion does in the Masters historically. Now with graphs! The one for the last fifteen years shows a more recent trend and also excludes Hendry era, because he tended to skew the graph more towards the winner’s end.
Note: N/A refers to UK champions who either didn’t play in Masters that year, e.g. Doug Mountjoy in 1989 and Ding in 2006, or lost in the wildcard round that year e.g. ROS in 1994.
-
Skullman - Posts: 27634
- Joined: 14 February 2012
- Location: Fighting crime
- Snooker Idol: Selby and Robbo