by Hamdeena » 08 Aug 2024 Read
If a player plays a red ball and cue ball jumps over the red ball and hit another red ball then it is a foul or not?
-
Hamdeena
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 28 July 2024
by chengdufan » 09 Aug 2024 Read
Good question. I don't know the answer to that
-
chengdufan
- Posts: 11921
- Joined: 08 July 2016
- Location: Chongqing
- Snooker Idol: Xiao Guodong
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: Europe - The Final Countdown
by SnookerEd25 » 09 Aug 2024 Read
I believe, though will defer to Andre or AcesInc should they happen by, if (in the opinion of the referee) it is unintentional, then no foul.
However, if it was intended (IE, a player better known for his or her pool talents proceeded to get out a jump cue and jump a red to pocket a second red), a foul would be called.
Of course, much is open to interpretation when it comes to intent, but that is my understanding, anyway.
-
SnookerEd25
- Posts: 20205
- Joined: 10 October 2011
- Location: West London
- Snooker Idol: Cliff Wilson
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: Play with Fire (Rolling Stones)
by Tim Dunkley » 09 Aug 2024 Read
A jump shot is made when the cue-ball passes over any part of
an object ball, whether hitting it in the process or not, except:
(a) when the cue-ball first hits one object ball, other than a
touching ball, and then jumps over another ball; or
(b) when the cue-ball jumps and hits an object ball, other
than a touching ball, and at the moment of landing on
the playing area, the cue-ball is not on the far side of the
current position of that object ball; or
(c) when, after legally hitting an object ball, other than a
touching ball, the cue-ball jumps over that ball after
hitting a cushion or another ball.
Intent does not come into it.
-
Tim Dunkley
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 23 January 2018
- Location: Southampton
by Prop » 09 Aug 2024 Read
Tim Dunkley wrote:A jump shot is made when the cue-ball passes over any part of
an object ball, whether hitting it in the process or not, except:
(a) when the cue-ball first hits one object ball, other than a
touching ball, and then jumps over another ball; or
(b) when the cue-ball jumps and hits an object ball, other
than a touching ball, and at the moment of landing on
the playing area, the cue-ball is not on the far side of the
current position of that object ball; or
(c) when, after legally hitting an object ball, other than a
touching ball, the cue-ball jumps over that ball after
hitting a cushion or another ball.
Intent does not come into it.
Has that always been the case? Seem to remember something with Bill Werbeniuk a while ago, and a rule change since then. Could be imagining it though
-
Prop
- Posts: 27498
- Joined: 16 December 2015
- Highest Break: 65
- Walk-On: Papua New Guinea - FSOL