Bank of Communications Shanghai Masters Final Discussion

SnookerFan wrote:What's to say about this final that isn't already blindingly obvious?

It's an obvious statement to say Judd is strong favourite. With the score being what it is, you could argue that this is an understatement.

There aren't many players that you'd feel as comfortable at pulling back this kind of score than John though. Though, again, pointing out it's a big ask is another pretty obvious statement.

It's one of those times where any kind of analysis seems unneccessary.

Skullman wrote:Break off, long red and on a baulk colour. Higgins looks up for this.

Skullman wrote:4 in a row. John Higgins. Shown his class here.

jojo wrote:sickpotter you will not grasp what im saying because you choose not to

who said luck even itself out over a best of thirty five frame match ? that wasnt the case here
higgins may or may not have made big breaks but he may have needed luck to get these opportunities instead of his opponent

but then again this is coming from someone who thinks hendry only say he had easier early round matches in his prime because he was so good and not because the standard of opposition wasnt as high as in later years that show people how deluded you can be so there is no point arguing with you

just interpret things the way you want like you normally do

ha

Alpha wrote:

Skullman wrote:4 in a row. John Higgins. Shown his class here.

You didn't think Higgins would lose 10-2 did you?

Sonny wrote:It's over.

Snooker Overdrive wrote:i can't believe this. even a five frames advantage is not good enough against John Higgins in a final. unbelievable