Post a reply

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby Monique

You see wild, this in my book was a good session. It had it all: it was quality, it was close, the momentum switched between the players.
You said yesterday that the fact that both players were missing made it exciting because anything could happen. Ok, I see your point. But here both were playing well overall and when that happens it makes the safety battles more exciting/tense because you know that whoever wins them is likely to win the frame, so there is more at stake than when you expect them to get any number of chances.
It's not a matter of you or me or anyone being right or wrong or not enough of a fan. It's a matter of taste and what makes us tick.

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby GJ

Witz78 wrote:Judd bottled this then has he?



robbo missed black to go 5-3

both missed a bad one each

judd did nothing wrong from 2-0 to 2-4

robbo was great
Last edited by GJ on 04 Nov 2012, edited 1 time in total.

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby GJ

Monique wrote:You see wild, this in my book was a good session. It had it all: it was quality, it was close, the momentum switched between the players.
You said yesterday that the fact that both players were missing made it exciting because anything could happen. Ok, I see your point. But here both were playing well overall and when that happens it makes the safety battles more exciting/tense because you know that whoever wins them is likely to win the frame, so there is more at stake than when you expect them to get any number of chances.
It's not a matter of you or me or anyone being right or wrong or not enough of a fan. It's a matter of taste and what makes us tick.



i enjoyed this session more than yesterdays TBH

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby Wildey

GJ wrote:he bottled nothing

grow up

your telling me.

its like being in kindergarten with some of these comments

its 5-4 in a best of 19 holy rubbish how is that bottling nothing.

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby Skullman

Well he was only 12-9 up on Higgins and was outplayed by him in the second day of the World Final and in Shanghai. He didn't bottle, he just wasn't good enough. Again he was outplayed by Maguire and he still won against Allen so he didn't bottle those.

I'll give you the match against Carter though.

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby Witz78

Skullman wrote:Well he was only 12-9 up on Higgins and was outplayed by him in the second day of the World Final and in Shanghai. He didn't bottle, he just wasn't good enough. Again he was outplayed by Maguire and he still won against Allen so he didn't bottle those.

I'll give you the match against Carter though.


regardless of how well an opponent plays anyone losing a 7-2 lead in a bo19 bottles it to an extent,

If you play the game, youll know what i mean <ok>

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby Wildey

Jewell wrote:2011 World Championship Final vs Higgins
Lost 18-15 from 13-9 up

2011 UK Final vs Allen
Won only 10-8 despite being 8-3 ahead

2012 German Masters QF vs Maguire
Lost 5-4 from 4-2 up

2012 World Championship R2 vs Carter
Lost 13-12 from 12-9 up

2012 Shanghai Masters Final vs Higgins
Lost 10-9 from 7-2 up

showing completly lack of snooker understanding

they were not bottle job you dont understand the meaning of the word.

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby GJ

Going on about bottling is just a sad way of diverting from the other player playing great because you dont happen to like the opponent.


the definition of bottling is stevens

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby vodkadiet

Wild WC wrote:
Jewell wrote:2011 World Championship Final vs Higgins
Lost 18-15 from 13-9 up

2011 UK Final vs Allen
Won only 10-8 despite being 8-3 ahead

2012 German Masters QF vs Maguire
Lost 5-4 from 4-2 up

2012 World Championship R2 vs Carter
Lost 13-12 from 12-9 up

2012 Shanghai Masters Final vs Higgins
Lost 10-9 from 7-2 up

showing completly lack of snooker understanding

they were not bottle job you dont understand the meaning of the word.


This is unfair Wild. Remember Trump has an immaculate record against Marcus Campbell.

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby Wildey

Jewell wrote:
Wild WC wrote:
Jewell wrote:2011 World Championship Final vs Higgins
Lost 18-15 from 13-9 up

2011 UK Final vs Allen
Won only 10-8 despite being 8-3 ahead

2012 German Masters QF vs Maguire
Lost 5-4 from 4-2 up

2012 World Championship R2 vs Carter
Lost 13-12 from 12-9 up

2012 Shanghai Masters Final vs Higgins
Lost 10-9 from 7-2 up

showing completly lack of snooker understanding

they were not bottle job you dont understand the meaning of the word.


Jimmy White was a bottler.

no he wasent again totally clueless

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby Wildey

Jewell wrote:
Wild WC wrote:
Jewell wrote:
Wild WC wrote:
Jewell wrote:2011 World Championship Final vs Higgins
Lost 18-15 from 13-9 up

2011 UK Final vs Allen
Won only 10-8 despite being 8-3 ahead

2012 German Masters QF vs Maguire
Lost 5-4 from 4-2 up

2012 World Championship R2 vs Carter
Lost 13-12 from 12-9 up

2012 Shanghai Masters Final vs Higgins
Lost 10-9 from 7-2 up

showing completly lack of snooker understanding

they were not bottle job you dont understand the meaning of the word.


Jimmy White was a bottler.

no he wasent again totally clueless


Losing 6 world finals, two of which he should have won in 92 and 94, says to me something different.

but you know nothing

Re: WS International Championship Final Discussion !!!

Postby Wildey

Skullman wrote:Why does Judd try to play right handed? He's rubbish at it.

playing over a pack would be difficult left handed so he deserves to lose the frame just for that shot