by Wildey » 06 Jul 2011 Read
Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.
well he did beat the guy who beat Mark Williams playing brilliantly in china.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by SnookerFan » 06 Jul 2011 Read
Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.
I should say, that's something I cut and paste off of twitter. It's not my actual opinion.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151044
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Roland » 06 Jul 2011 Read
Wild wrote:Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.
well he did beat the guy who beat Mark Williams playing brilliantly in china.
OK then Wild is going for Pinches and I'm going for Williams. £100 to the winner? We can exchange bank account details if you want?
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by SnookerFan » 06 Jul 2011 Read
Sonny wrote:Wild wrote:Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.
well he did beat the guy who beat Mark Williams playing brilliantly in china.
OK then Wild is going for Pinches and I'm going for Williams. £100 to the winner? We can exchange bank account details if you want?
Wild would struggle to get ten quid together.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151044
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Wildey » 06 Jul 2011 Read
Sonny wrote:Wild wrote:Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.
well he did beat the guy who beat Mark Williams playing brilliantly in china.
OK then Wild is going for Pinches and I'm going for Williams. £100 to the winner? We can exchange bank account details if you want?
no thanx im with you
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Wildey » 11 Jul 2011 Read
WorldSnooker1 World Snooker
Graeme Dott has pulled out of the Australian Goldfields Open due to a neck problem
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Witz78 » 11 Jul 2011 Read
Wild wrote:WorldSnooker1 World Snooker
Graeme Dott has pulled out of the Australian Goldfields Open due to a neck problem
who gets a bye to r2 then?
id sooner see them draft in another Aussie wildcard to play whoever Dott was meant to be playing, or better still promote the highest ranked guy who was playing one of the Mifsuds into that match and draft in a 3rd Aussie and have an all Aussie wildcard match.
-
Witz78
- Posts: 15036
- Joined: 02 February 2010
by Wildey » 11 Jul 2011 Read
Dave Gilbert or James Mifsud...
i really do think theres a case here of putting Gilbert through to Dotts place and get another Aussie Wild Card to play mifsud.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Roland » 11 Jul 2011 Read
There's not a "case" to do anything. Dott withdraws, opponent gets a bye. Simple.
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Wildey » 11 Jul 2011 Read
Sonny wrote:There's not a "case" to do anything. Dott withdraws, opponent gets a bye. Simple.
yes your right
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by GJ » 11 Jul 2011 Read
tennis has it right with a lucky loser system
byes = BS
-
GJ
- Posts: 28243
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by Wildey » 11 Jul 2011 Read
GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system
byes = BS
na loser means you lost no way back go and cook the dinner.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by GJ » 11 Jul 2011 Read
Wild wrote:GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system
byes = BS
na loser means you lost no way back go and cook the dinner.
and a player wins the event winning same number of matches as the losing finalist
great logic
-
GJ
- Posts: 28243
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by Wildey » 11 Jul 2011 Read
theres enough top class semi pros/amataurs playing in PTC thats a better option than asking jack lisowski who lost a qualifyer to jump on a plane.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Witz78 » 11 Jul 2011 Read
Wild wrote:Dave Gilbert or James Mifsud...
i really do think theres a case here of putting Gilbert through to Dotts place and get another Aussie Wild Card to play mifsud.
this scenario isnt too bad actually compared to normal
Gilbert qualified by right for the last 32 then was forced to play a Wildcard round to get into thelast 32 which hed already qualified for.
Now this match v Mifsud effectively becomes a last 32 match now though, so its came full circle.
-
Witz78
- Posts: 15036
- Joined: 02 February 2010
by Witz78 » 11 Jul 2011 Read
Will Gould be in Australia now?
-
Witz78
- Posts: 15036
- Joined: 02 February 2010
by Bourne » 11 Jul 2011 Read
GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system
byes = BS
Snooker is so outdated in this
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by Wildey » 11 Jul 2011 Read
Bourne wrote:GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system
byes = BS
Snooker is so outdated in this
dont talk through your ass how the buck putting bucking losers in a draw is right if they lose they not lucky and should buck the hell off.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Bourne » 11 Jul 2011 Read
Wild wrote:Bourne wrote:GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system
byes = BS
Snooker is so outdated in this
dont talk through your ass how the little kitten putting little kittens playing with each other having fun losers in a draw is right if they lose they not lucky and should little kitten the hell off.
So how is it right that the opponent is allowed to be lucky and win through no skill or quality of his own, just because he landed a 16/1 shot in drawing a crock ? Sorry but it sucks, the tournament is bigger than one player
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by Wildey » 11 Jul 2011 Read
you have got a point but putting in a loser
in snooker theres enough options with Ben Harrison
etc but in tennis obviously they cant do that can they ?
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64448
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only