Topic locked

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Wildey

Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.

well he did beat the guy who beat Mark Williams playing brilliantly in china.

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby SnookerFan

Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.


rofl rofl

I should say, that's something I cut and paste off of twitter. It's not my actual opinion.

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Roland

Wild wrote:
Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.

well he did beat the guy who beat Mark Williams playing brilliantly in china.


OK then Wild is going for Pinches and I'm going for Williams. £100 to the winner? We can exchange bank account details if you want?

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby SnookerFan

Sonny wrote:
Wild wrote:
Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.

well he did beat the guy who beat Mark Williams playing brilliantly in china.


OK then Wild is going for Pinches and I'm going for Williams. £100 to the winner? We can exchange bank account details if you want?


Wild would struggle to get ten quid together. rofl

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Wildey

Sonny wrote:
Wild wrote:
Sonny wrote:Has he bullocks.

well he did beat the guy who beat Mark Williams playing brilliantly in china.


OK then Wild is going for Pinches and I'm going for Williams. £100 to the winner? We can exchange bank account details if you want?

no thanx im with you <laugh>

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Wildey

WorldSnooker1 World Snooker
Graeme Dott has pulled out of the Australian Goldfields Open due to a neck problem

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Witz78

Wild wrote:
WorldSnooker1 World Snooker
Graeme Dott has pulled out of the Australian Goldfields Open due to a neck problem


who gets a bye to r2 then?

id sooner see them draft in another Aussie wildcard to play whoever Dott was meant to be playing, or better still promote the highest ranked guy who was playing one of the Mifsuds into that match and draft in a 3rd Aussie and have an all Aussie wildcard match.

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Wildey

Dave Gilbert or James Mifsud...

i really do think theres a case here of putting Gilbert through to Dotts place and get another Aussie Wild Card to play mifsud.

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Roland

There's not a "case" to do anything. Dott withdraws, opponent gets a bye. Simple. <ok>

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Wildey

Sonny wrote:There's not a "case" to do anything. Dott withdraws, opponent gets a bye. Simple. <ok>

yes your right <ok>

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby GJ

tennis has it right with a lucky loser system

byes = BS

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Wildey

GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system

byes = BS

na loser means you lost no way back go and cook the dinner.

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby GJ

Wild wrote:
GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system

byes = BS

na loser means you lost no way back go and cook the dinner.



and a player wins the event winning same number of matches as the losing finalist

great logic

rofl :?

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Wildey

theres enough top class semi pros/amataurs playing in PTC thats a better option than asking jack lisowski who lost a qualifyer to jump on a plane.

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Witz78

Wild wrote:Dave Gilbert or James Mifsud...

i really do think theres a case here of putting Gilbert through to Dotts place and get another Aussie Wild Card to play mifsud.


this scenario isnt too bad actually compared to normal

Gilbert qualified by right for the last 32 then was forced to play a Wildcard round to get into thelast 32 which hed already qualified for.

Now this match v Mifsud effectively becomes a last 32 match now though, so its came full circle.

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Bourne

GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system

byes = BS

:spot on:

Snooker is so outdated in this :td:

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Wildey

Bourne wrote:
GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system

byes = BS

:spot on:

Snooker is so outdated in this :td:

dont talk through your ass how the buck putting bucking losers in a draw is right if they lose they not lucky and should buck the hell off.

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Bourne

Wild wrote:
Bourne wrote:
GJ wrote:tennis has it right with a lucky loser system

byes = BS

:spot on:

Snooker is so outdated in this :td:

dont talk through your ass how the little kitten putting little kittens playing with each other having fun losers in a draw is right if they lose they not lucky and should little kitten the hell off.

So how is it right that the opponent is allowed to be lucky and win through no skill or quality of his own, just because he landed a 16/1 shot in drawing a crock ? Sorry but it sucks, the tournament is bigger than one player <ok>

Re: AUSTRALIAN OPEN DRAWS

Postby Wildey

you have got a point but putting in a loser :?

in snooker theres enough options with Ben Harrison ;-) etc but in tennis obviously they cant do that can they ?