Re: Bank Of Beijing China Open Quarter Final Discussion!!!!
Just tallying up lost three already
- PLtheRef
- Posts: 5080
- Joined: 20 December 2009
- Location: Sheffield
- Highest Break: 28
- Walk-On: Vangelis 1492 Conquest of Paradise
Skullman wrote:How do people see his match with Ding going? I personally think that Ding should have too much, but I think he'd be more susceptible to grinding than Robbo was.
Skullman wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:Very well done Ebdon, I didn't think he could do it but he grinded out the 2011 and 2010 World Champion in succession.
Maybe he'll grind out the 2012 and 2013 Champs as well
Snooker Overdrive wrote:Skullman wrote:How do people see his match with Ding going? I personally think that Ding should have too much, but I think he'd be more susceptible to grinding than Robbo was.
If Robbo is that unsusceptible to grinding why has he lost every match against Ebdon then? I don't think there are many more players with a worse h2h record against Peter.
Odrl wrote:Whatever type of snooker you enjoy, I think there was something for everyone today.
Skullman wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:Skullman wrote:How do people see his match with Ding going? I personally think that Ding should have too much, but I think he'd be more susceptible to grinding than Robbo was.
If Robbo is that unsusceptible to grinding why has he lost every match against Ebdon then? I don't think there are many more players with a worse h2h record against Peter.
He's not immune to it, he just copes with better than Ding does, in my opinion.
Snooker Overdrive wrote:Skullman wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:Skullman wrote:How do people see his match with Ding going? I personally think that Ding should have too much, but I think he'd be more susceptible to grinding than Robbo was.
If Robbo is that unsusceptible to grinding why has he lost every match against Ebdon then? I don't think there are many more players with a worse h2h record against Peter.
He's not immune to it, he just copes with better than Ding does, in my opinion.
You didn't answer the question
Skullman wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:Skullman wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:Skullman wrote:How do people see his match with Ding going? I personally think that Ding should have too much, but I think he'd be more susceptible to grinding than Robbo was.
If Robbo is that unsusceptible to grinding why has he lost every match against Ebdon then? I don't think there are many more players with a worse h2h record against Peter.
He's not immune to it, he just copes with better than Ding does, in my opinion.
You didn't answer the question
I did. Robbo's not immune to grinding and he faced the master.
Snooker Overdrive wrote:That would mean Robbo is more susceptible to grinding than almost every other player on the tour. So, there have to be other reasons - Carter for example has no problem at all with Ebdon.
So your original statement that Ding could lose because he's more susceptible to grinding than Robbo doesn't make sense.