by Wildey » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Ronnie O'Sullivan 0-2 Marcus Campbell
Shaun Murphy 2-2 Lu Ning
Matthew Stevens 2-1 Peter Ebdon
Ali Carter 2-1 Dominic Dale
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Wildey » 28 Mar 2012 Read
club standard hacking from Ronnie
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by SnookerFan » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Wild wrote:Ronnie O'Sullivan 0-2 Marcus Campbell
Shaun Murphy 2-2 Lu Ning
Matthew Stevens 2-1 Peter Ebdon
Ali Carter 2-1 Dominic Dale
COME ON DALE! YOU BEAUTIFUL, BEAUTIFUL MAN!
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 148403
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by boris_the_butcher » 28 Mar 2012 Read
this is the snooker equivilent of a boxer standing with his hands down inviting his opponent to knock him out.
-
boris_the_butcher
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: 28 January 2010
- Snooker Idol: Ron
- Walk-On: a new kind of water
by Wildey » 28 Mar 2012 Read
boris_the_butcher wrote:this is the snooker equivilent of a boxer standing with his hands down inviting his opponent to knock him out.
yes
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Muppet147 » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Another scrappy frame. O'Sullivan trails 3-0.
-
Muppet147
- Posts: 5571
- Joined: 07 September 2011
by Roland » 28 Mar 2012 Read
I went 300 points on Ronnie to win I think.
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Wildey » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Sonny wrote:I went 300 points on Ronnie to win I think.
dont worry i went 600 on him and 600 on murphy at 2-0 down both matches i was up the creek lol
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by boris_the_butcher » 28 Mar 2012 Read
it's a long way to come and play like this, his visit most likely centered on sponsorship commitments rather than any intention of playing proper snooker. Campbell just getting on with it, nice and steady.
-
boris_the_butcher
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: 28 January 2010
- Snooker Idol: Ron
- Walk-On: a new kind of water
by Andre147 » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Snooker Overdrive wrote:The most bizarre Ronnie match I have seen for a long time.
yes campbell needed 3 snookers in that frame, got one with Ronnie smashing the cushion and missing a very simple red, then was unlucky to knock that black in, but in the end he won it... but Campbell had everything to win that frame, hadnt he missed that pink 4 nil and I think there would be no german masters comeback..
As it is, 3-1, well you can never tell with Ronnie. but better 3-1 than 4 nil
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41673
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by Andre147 » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Snooker Overdrive wrote:The most bizarre Ronnie match I have seen for a long time.
And by the way, you said the exact same thing in the Ronnie v Higginson match in Germany, so not that long ago
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41673
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by Wildey » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Ronnie O'Sullivan 1-3 Marcus Campbell
Shaun Murphy 2-3 Lu Ning
Matthew Stevens 2-2 Peter Ebdon
Ali Carter 2-3 Dominic Dale
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by SnookerFan » 28 Mar 2012 Read
What a prospect this Ning kid is.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 148403
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Snooker Overdrive » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Andre147 wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:The most bizarre Ronnie match I have seen for a long time.
yes campbell needed 3 snookers in that frame, got one with Ronnie smashing the cushion and missing a very simple red, then was unlucky to knock that black in, but in the end he won it... but Campbell had everything to win that frame, hadnt he missed that pink 4 nil and I think there would be no german masters comeback..
As it is, 3-1, well you can never tell with Ronnie. but better 3-1 than 4 nil
Campbell needed 4 snookers.
If Ronnie would turn it on, Campbell wouldn't have a chance but O'Sullivan looks tired and disinterested.
-
Snooker Overdrive
- Posts: 13796
- Joined: 10 December 2010
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by Snooker Overdrive » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Andre147 wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:The most bizarre Ronnie match I have seen for a long time.
And by the way, you said the exact same thing in the Ronnie v Higginson match in Germany, so not that long ago
Did I
It's a very bizarre match though.
-
Snooker Overdrive
- Posts: 13796
- Joined: 10 December 2010
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by Roland » 28 Mar 2012 Read
was unlucky to knock the black in or bloody hell that was a great shot to knock the black in and make it look like a bad shot depending on how cynically you are watching the match
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Smart » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Sonny wrote:was unlucky to knock the black in or bloody hell that was a great shot to knock the black in and make it look like a bad shot depending on how cynically you are watching the match
my thoughts exactly
-
Smart
- Posts: 25364
- Joined: 03 October 2009
- Location: Siberia
- Snooker Idol: JOE JOGIA
- Highest Break: 3
- Walk-On: http://snookerydookery.freeforums.net/
-
by Wildey » 28 Mar 2012 Read
i think Murphy will be going to the Lu after this frame
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Andre147 » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Snooker Overdrive wrote:Andre147 wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:The most bizarre Ronnie match I have seen for a long time.
yes campbell needed 3 snookers in that frame, got one with Ronnie smashing the cushion and missing a very simple red, then was unlucky to knock that black in, but in the end he won it... but Campbell had everything to win that frame, hadnt he missed that pink 4 nil and I think there would be no german masters comeback..
As it is, 3-1, well you can never tell with Ronnie. but better 3-1 than 4 nil
Campbell needed 4 snookers.
If Ronnie would turn it on, Campbell wouldn't have a chance but O'Sullivan looks tired and disinterested.
Yes, he needed 4 snookers, and Campbell isnt playing well, a bit more interes on the part of Ronnie and the result could have been 3-1 to him easily.. as it is, if Ronnie continues like that, cant see him winning...
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41673
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by Wildey » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Wild wrote:i think Murphy will be going to the Lu after this frame
i was wrong hes recycling in his pants in his seat
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Wildey » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Andre147 wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:Andre147 wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:The most bizarre Ronnie match I have seen for a long time.
yes campbell needed 3 snookers in that frame, got one with Ronnie smashing the cushion and missing a very simple red, then was unlucky to knock that black in, but in the end he won it... but Campbell had everything to win that frame, hadnt he missed that pink 4 nil and I think there would be no german masters comeback..
As it is, 3-1, well you can never tell with Ronnie. but better 3-1 than 4 nil
Campbell needed 4 snookers.
If Ronnie would turn it on, Campbell wouldn't have a chance but O'Sullivan looks tired and disinterested.
Yes, he needed 4 snookers, and Campbell isnt playing well, a bit more interes on the part of Ronnie and the result could have been 3-1 to him easily.. as it is, if Ronnie continues like that, cant see him winning...
to be honest Ronnie dragging campbell down to his level.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Andre147 » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Lu ning with back to back centuries, superb stuff from him against Murphy
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41673
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by Snooker Overdrive » 28 Mar 2012 Read
Andre147 wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:Andre147 wrote:Snooker Overdrive wrote:The most bizarre Ronnie match I have seen for a long time.
yes campbell needed 3 snookers in that frame, got one with Ronnie smashing the cushion and missing a very simple red, then was unlucky to knock that black in, but in the end he won it... but Campbell had everything to win that frame, hadnt he missed that pink 4 nil and I think there would be no german masters comeback..
As it is, 3-1, well you can never tell with Ronnie. but better 3-1 than 4 nil
Campbell needed 4 snookers.
If Ronnie would turn it on, Campbell wouldn't have a chance but O'Sullivan looks tired and disinterested.
Yes, he needed 4 snookers, and Campbell isnt playing well, a bit more interes on the part of Ronnie and the result could have been 3-1 to him easily.. as it is, if Ronnie continues like that, cant see him winning...
If Ronnie could win this match playing like he did so far, it would be one of his greatest achievements.
-
Snooker Overdrive
- Posts: 13796
- Joined: 10 December 2010
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie