Ronnie79 wrote:Ding without doubt. he has won more than jimmy already, losing 6 finals should not put white ahead of him.
Erza Scarlet wrote:Jimmy simply because of the 6 world finals. He must've been doing something great to keep reaching so many finals. Just kept messing up in a few of them and having to face prime Hendry...
Johnny Bravo wrote:Ding is the better player, but Jimmy is still greater. But Ding will probably surpass him.
Vallomas wrote:Ding has won more titles, but prime Jimmy had to play only a few rankers per season - and still won 10.
HustleKing wrote:Vallomas wrote:Ding has won more titles, but prime Jimmy had to play only a few rankers per season - and still won 10.
Does that mean we have to assume Jimmy would have won at least 15, if not 20, if he came on the scene a bit later? Nobody uses that assumption when comparing Hendry and O'Sullivan, so why use it on lesser players?
KrazeeEyezKilla wrote:White won the World Matchplay twice when it had a best of 35 final. He also won the 1991 World Masters which had the first £200,000 first prize.
HustleKing wrote:Iranu wrote:Honestly, who cares?
You're right, anybody who hasn't won a World Title is a nobody