Is The Masters elite?

If it is not then there are no elite tournaments

No.

On the topic of elite tournaments, the draw is out for the shootout.
Craig Steadman looking dangerous in his half of the draw.


http://www.worldsnooker.com/wp-content/ ... draw-1.pdf

Badsnookerplayer wrote:On the topic of elite tournaments, the draw is out for the shootout.
Craig Steadman looking dangerous in his half of the draw.


http://www.worldsnooker.com/wp-content/ ... draw-1.pdf

21 amateurs. 14-year-old Ben Mertens against 49-year-old James Wattana. 12-year-old Liam Davies against Rickety Rick. Love it

Deewee wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:On the topic of elite tournaments, the draw is out for the shootout.
Craig Steadman looking dangerous in his half of the draw.


http://www.worldsnooker.com/wp-content/ ... draw-1.pdf

21 amateurs. 14-year-old Ben Mertens against 49-year-old James Wattana. 12-year-old Liam Davies against Rickety Rick. Love it

Would love to see Little Ben Mertens win this

Of course it is.

It's the top 16, not the middle 16.

Yeah, the Masters is disgustingly elite.

They totally need a 16 man tournament annually for players who have never won a major, and have that tournament count as a major

HustleKing wrote:Yeah, the Masters is disgustingly elite.

They totally need a 16 man tournament annually for players who have never won a major, and have that tournament count as a major

SnookerFan wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:On the topic of elite tournaments, the draw is out for the shootout.
Craig Steadman looking dangerous in his half of the draw.


http://www.worldsnooker.com/wp-content/ ... draw-1.pdf

I think we can all agree the Shootout isn't elite.

Of course it is Barry Hawkins has won it.

It’s a poor mans Shootout

it's definitely elite, ties in the afternoon and bow tie's in the evening, it's like the Bullingdon club all over again.