Should we abolish player's wearing wasictoasts and trousers?

SnookerFan wrote:I only really watch snooker and horror movies.

She has been in horror films too. Cabin in the Woods I believe she is in for example.

I don't think she has taken up Snooker yet.

The_Abbott wrote:Agree - the Gifted she is really annoying in too. In fact the whole family is annoying.

Person of Interest is a really good show as is Alias and Angel. Dollhouse was just weird but some good ideas in there.

Yeah the Gifted would be a much better series without the Strucker family. Amy does the best she can with the material she's given (she's my favourite actor anyway) but the dialogue across the series is generally poor.

Dollhouse started off not that great but got better halfway through the season (episode 6 is the first time you really see the potential for the series). Then when they got cancelled in season 2 and just went balls-to-the-wall with fast paced storytelling it went up another notch.

Plus Epitaph One is one of the best episodes of TV that Joss Whedon has been involved in.

It had a really great concept.

The_Abbott wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:I only really watch snooker and horror movies.

She has been in horror films too. Cabin in the Woods I believe she is in for example.

I don't think she has taken up Snooker yet.

I must know her then. I've seen that.

Was she the bird who alive at the end with the stoner bloke?

SnookerFan wrote:

The_Abbott wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:I only really watch snooker and horror movies.

She has been in horror films too. Cabin in the Woods I believe she is in for example.

I don't think she has taken up Snooker yet.

I must know her then. I've seen that.

Was she the bird who alive at the end with the stoner bloke?

She was one of the scientists who were orchestrating it.

Great film, that.

She was also in the 2012 adaptation of Much Ado About Nothing.

I watched a bit of Alias once because I saw the lead character walking into a building In her underwear.

Waistcoats, aside from adding some class are helpful to the players, they prevent them accidentally fouling by touching balls with their shirts

Sickpotter wrote:Waistcoats, aside from adding some class are helpful to the players, they prevent them accidentally fouling by touching balls with their shirts

Fair point this.

Didn't think of the practical implications.

I wonder if this style of waistcoat will ever make a comeback:





There's probably not enoughb room for the sponsor logo's on those ones...

Not a fan of sponsors on the sleeves

They could have sponsors on the back. They're on screen as often as the torsos are.

Robert Milkins to have Fergus & Sons Tractors printed across his bottom next year

Buttocks

sundaygirl wrote:Buttocks

They should abolish buttocks.

Holden Chinaski wrote:I wonder if this style of waistcoat will ever make a comeback:





There's probably not enoughb room for the sponsor logo's on those ones...

They use these to paint the fence these days.

SnookerFan wrote:

Sickpotter wrote:Waistcoats, aside from adding some class are helpful to the players, they prevent them accidentally fouling by touching balls with their shirts

Fair point this.

Didn't think of the practical implications.

Yes, their shirts are a little bit larger than regular shirts, no slim fit, really easy to touch the balls without waistcoats.

Maybe all players should wear Coventry City shirts

I just ran into this thread and saw an interesting discussion here. I wonder why they would need someone to cancel their so-called uniform?

I just ran into this thread and saw an interesting discussion here.

LaurenWelchat wrote:I just ran into this thread and saw an interesting discussion here. I wonder why they would need someone to cancel their so-called uniform?

Cause it hampers players when playing certain shots.

SnookerEd25 wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:I only really watch snooker and horror movies.

This is not true; you watache quiz shows, the Larkins and at least one crapppy Reality TV show (the Apprentice) too.

And The Flash, that time Andre got the hump with me about it.

SnookerEd25 wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:I only really watch snooker and horror movies.

This is not true; you watache quiz shows, the Larkins and at least one crapppy Reality TV show (the Apprentice) too.

And musicals based on cult 80s films.

Iranu wrote:

SnookerEd25 wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:I only really watch snooker and horror movies.

This is not true; you watache quiz shows, the Larkins and at least one crapppy Reality TV show (the Apprentice) too.

And musicals based on cult 80s films.

Not just based on 80s films.

I saw Book Of Mormon and Wicked.

Have you seen Heathers yet?

Heathers

the players should continue to wear both waistcoats and trousers, as noone want to see them play in their skivvies.

Wacis toasts.

sundaygirl wrote:Have you seen Heathers yet?

Yes. Last week.

MONK!!