by snooker_loopy » 01 Dec 2016 Read
Quote:
"There are a lot of players I watch out there and they can't play. "That's no disrespect, they just can't play. They are never going to be good enough."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/snooker/38160821No-one starts at the top of the rankings. He rose up the ranks very quickly due to his mega-talent, but if there were a top 16 or top 32 only you'd still need a mechanism to allow the few unknown new players to have a chance to prove their worth. Perhaps you could reduce snooker to a top 32 only and have a lower ranked division of 18 players all trying to break into the top 32. That would mean a total of 50 pro players, not 128.
I think the basic point about lower ranked players not good enough is true, although it's a harsh truth, and one that very few people within the game would admit to in interviews.
-
snooker_loopy
- Posts: 398
- Joined: 26 April 2013
by Ayrshirebhoy » 01 Dec 2016 Read
He has a very good point. Today's snooker players aren't even close to the class of 92.
-

Ayrshirebhoy
- Posts: 964
- Joined: 27 February 2011
- Snooker Idol: John higgins
- Highest Break: 34
- Walk-On: Sultans of Swing
by PoolBoy » 01 Dec 2016 Read
Zhao Xintong and Yan Bingtao are two supremely talented young Chinese players who are sure to have a big future in the game.
Yet, neither are (yet) inside the top-64 in the World Rankings - but they've goy to start somewhere!
-

PoolBoy
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: 14 April 2014
- Location: Inverness
by Cloud Strife » 01 Dec 2016 Read
Good enough for what though? Be world champion? If that's the case Ronnie is right, the vast majority aren't good enough, and that has always been the case. Very few will ever win the world title, or any title for that matter.
There is still a need for them though. All sports require the jobbers, those guys who are there simply to make up the numbers and make the stars like Ronnie look good.
-

Cloud Strife
- Posts: 18820
- Joined: 28 January 2014
- Location: Antarctica
- Snooker Idol: Roger Federer
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Don Vedda - buck You
-
by snooker_loopy » 01 Dec 2016 Read
I suppose Ronnie's comment is just survival of the fittest. If you're good enough you'll win or reach enough semis and quarter finals to have a good or high level of income, if you're not good enough then tough. Go get another job.
It's a brutal way to look at the game but if 75 percent of players aren't that good - good enough to reach the last 16 of most events - then you could argue if you got rid of them the overall standard would be better. As I suggested, 50 professionals could be a new direction. 50 pros could improve the overall standard. Obviously players ranked below 50 would lose their income and jobs! But hey, it's a tough sport. Ronnie does speak out in a controversial way but you could argue his point of view has some merit.
-
snooker_loopy
- Posts: 398
- Joined: 26 April 2013
by TheRocket » 17 Feb 2017 Read
I doubt, you can take that seriously. Thats just the political correct O'Sullivan. Unfortunately hes always talking like a bog-standard good hearted commentator in the Eurosport studio. Praising even the weakest journeyman. That's why I think, Hendry does a much better job as a pundit as he's always honest and says what he thinks.
But Ronnie looks like a completely different man and tries so hard to be some kind of a role model.
-

TheRocket
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by Cloud Strife » 17 Feb 2017 Read
Hendry and Ronnie are two players that I never would've imagined doing punditry/commentary in a million years. They never struck me as guys who would take an interest in anything snooker related other than their own careers, and would disappear once retired.
And yet here they are, you can't keep them off the TV screen lol.
-

Cloud Strife
- Posts: 18820
- Joined: 28 January 2014
- Location: Antarctica
- Snooker Idol: Roger Federer
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Don Vedda - buck You
-
by Pink Ball » 17 Feb 2017 Read
Cloud Strife wrote:Hendry and Ronnie are two players that I never would've imagined doing punditry/commentary in a million years. They never struck me as guys who would take an interest in anything snooker related other than their own careers, and would disappear once retired.
And yet here they are, you can't keep them off the TV screen lol.
Totally agree. And more surprisingly, they're both very good at punditry too.
-

Pink Ball
- Posts: 22619
- Joined: 07 April 2015
- Location: Galway city, Ireland
- Snooker Idol: You are a banker
- Walk-On: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkfgIUiCiUQ
by TheSaviour » 17 Feb 2017 Read
PoolBoy wrote:Zhao Xintong and Yan Bingtao are two supremely talented young Chinese players who are sure to have a big future in the game.
Yet, neither are (yet) inside the top-64 in the World Rankings - but they've goy to start somewhere!
But talent itself means absolutely nothing. So far it seems China (or far-East) has failed to stamp their authority like they managed to stamp it in table-tennis. Or in badminton. Even when these days China has superior amounts of a hobby snooker players. For example now an on-going Welsh Open has a Quarter-final field where 5/8 of players are Englishmen. Which is perfectly a normal situation. Then there are 1 from Norway, 1 from Scotland and 1 from China. Don´t know. But these days England rules the game. If now thinking these 8 players, Stuart Carrington looks like someone who could have a slightly better results than he usually has. And I must admit I am slightly bored that Stuart Bingham and Barry Hawkins almost always are there.. Well they are both a really handy, but they could try to add something new or more.. But fair play anyway to Stuart and Barry that they managed to have that good results consistently. I just can´t see Barry Hawkins could continue to have a deep runs a much longer anymore. He will be in troubles in Sheffield. Obviously it depends what kind of a draw he gets. So many diffenrent options.
-
TheSaviour
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: 27 May 2014
- Location: Vandalising is boring when you have nothing to say.
- Snooker Idol: At times David Gilbert.
- Highest Break: 147
by sas6789 » 17 Feb 2017 Read
Today it's "the strength and depth has never been higher", but in this video just a couple of months age it's "The standard isn't good now, I could have beat them when I was 11.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKJUw14fdckMake up your mind Ronnie LOL.
-
sas6789
- Posts: 472
- Joined: 06 June 2014
by Andre147 » 17 Feb 2017 Read
It's quite simple really... The standard in the overall Tour has never been higher than it is today, however the standard in the Top 32 and especially Top 16/10 is nowehere near what it was between 98-2005.
The players lower down the rankings have never been better, but not the players in the upper echelons of the game.
-

Andre147
- Posts: 42526
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by The Herminator » 17 Feb 2017 Read
Maybe Hendry should come out of retirement then. Could he be competitive?
-

The Herminator
- Posts: 294
- Joined: 24 January 2017
- Snooker Idol: Lianne Crofts
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: When the music's over
by Andre147 » 17 Feb 2017 Read
The Herminator wrote:Maybe Hendry should come out of retirement then. Could he be competitive?
Top 32 material I reckon.
-

Andre147
- Posts: 42526
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by Iranu » 17 Feb 2017 Read
It's simple to rationalise: the lowest standard on tour is higher than it used to be, but the highest standard on tour is lower than it used to be.
Doesn't necessarily mean that's what he meant though.
-

Iranu
- Posts: 43433
- Joined: 24 January 2010
- Walk-On: Fort Knox - Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
by The Herminator » 17 Feb 2017 Read
Andre147 wrote:The Herminator wrote:Maybe Hendry should come out of retirement then. Could he be competitive?
Top 32 material I reckon.
Maybe, but he'd need to put the hours in. Saw him against Steve Davis a year or two ago at Snooker Legends and he was struggling, even with those buckets. Davis on the other hand knocked in 3 consecutive centuries...
-

The Herminator
- Posts: 294
- Joined: 24 January 2017
- Snooker Idol: Lianne Crofts
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: When the music's over
by Alex0paul » 17 Feb 2017 Read
If Hendry had continued to play I believe he would've won at least one event between 2012-now
-

Alex0paul
- Posts: 27329
- Joined: 03 December 2009
- Location: Plymouth
- Snooker Idol: Graeme Dott Joe OConnor
- Highest Break: 97
- Walk-On: Loco in Acapulco
by Andre147 » 17 Feb 2017 Read
Alex0paul wrote:If Hendry had continued to play I believe he would've won at least one event between 2012-now
We'll never know, he would have had to have a favourable draw. I could see him beat a top player in these shorter formats, but if he faces too many of them, he would lose at some point.
If guys like Hamilton, King can win them, there's no reason why Hendry couldn't, if, as I said, he had a fairly kind draw.
-

Andre147
- Posts: 42526
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by vodkadiet » 17 Feb 2017 Read
O'Sullivan is right. The standard of play now is awful. King andHamilton winning events when they should be drawing their pension sums up the plight of snooker today.
-

vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings