by GJ » 05 May 2014 Read
Will more top names now start to use the Ronnie method and prioritise the big events.
With the points system alot of them were reluctant to but with the new money list surely its the smart move.
I think the new system gives the big names a chance to stay at the top for longer.
-

GJ
- Posts: 28214
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by freakmoomin » 05 May 2014 Read
Yeah I'm a bit baffled by it to be honest.
Adding all the PTC's etc and rolling rankings was meant to help the younger players come through....but the new ranking system seems to be the complete opposite and helps the established players more than the original system ever did.
The new ranking system and the news about Hendry and Davis wildcards says to me that snooker is in trouble.......hearn's decisions recently seem to be the exact opposite of his stance when he first took over.
I dont really get it all.
-
freakmoomin
- Posts: 229
- Joined: 28 April 2011
- Snooker Idol: Stephen Hendry
by Blavdes » 05 May 2014 Read
I definitely think so too. Robertson though in his post match conference after the semi was scathing of the new system saying there's no WN1 anymore it's just money and too heavily weighted to the Worlds.
-

Blavdes
- Posts: 317
- Joined: 12 December 2013
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
by AC or LT? » 05 May 2014 Read
Hearn cares about one thing online money, it's not suprising that a money obsessive like him would centre the entire system around an unimportant and imperfect measurement system.
Bring bank ranking points and traditionally qualifying.
-
AC or LT?
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: 30 April 2012
- Snooker Idol: Peter Ebdon
- Highest Break: 15
- Walk-On: http://147talk.boards.net/
-
by GJ » 05 May 2014 Read
The golf system appears the best imo
1year money list
And 2year world ranking points system
-

GJ
- Posts: 28214
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by vodkadiet » 05 May 2014 Read
I think they should use the same system they use in tennis, where they take the points from the player's best 18 events. In snooker it could be 14.
-

vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings
by GJ » 05 May 2014 Read
Good shout mate
-

GJ
- Posts: 28214
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: NI
- Snooker Idol: Robbo and Kyren
- Highest Break: 155
- Walk-On: Advanced Australia Fair
by snooky147 » 05 May 2014 Read
vodkadiet wrote:I think they should use the same system they use in tennis, where they take the points from the player's best 18 events. In snooker it could be 14.
I agree with that too. It's a far fairer way to work, not that Hearn cares in the least about fairness.
-

snooky147
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: 27 March 2011
- Snooker Idol: Graeme Dott
- Highest Break: 76
- Walk-On: Comfortably Numb
by vodkadiet » 05 May 2014 Read
GJ wrote:Good shout mate

-

vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings
by vodkadiet » 05 May 2014 Read
snooky147 wrote:vodkadiet wrote:I think they should use the same system they use in tennis, where they take the points from the player's best 18 events. In snooker it could be 14.
I agree with that too. It's a far fairer way to work, not that Hearn cares in the least about fairness.
With Hearn it's all about making money, hence the nickname Barry 'Earn.
-

vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings