Re: Hearn: John Higgin's reputation is tarnished
Monique wrote:The main difference though was that King never went along with it or gave the impression he would agree. And that's a massive difference.
My understanding is also that it happened under the old board (or am I mistaken?). That doesn't change the rules of course but given the way cases of actual suspicious behaviours had been dealt with (or rather not dealt with) maybe King was entitled to think it was not even worth the effort to report it.
True, but John was found guilty of not reporting the approach which atoned for a large portion of the 6 months. King however......
-
Casey - Posts: 8520
- Joined: 03 October 2009
- Location: Ireland
- Snooker Idol: Hendry Allen