Post a reply

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby Wildey

gallantrabbit wrote:Great read from Steve Dawson responding to our non ambassador Ronnie on WST site

Ronnie talked a lot the Attention seeking Git and Said nothing at all just Verbal Diareahh

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby chengdufan

Wildey wrote:Diareahh

Presumably that's what it's called when it's particularly painful :chin:

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby SnookerEd25

chengdufan wrote:
Wildey wrote:Diareahh

Presumably that's what it's called when it's particularly painful :chin:


I don’t know. Sounds like the relief of medication to me… :chin:

Syrup of Higgs?

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby SnookerEd25

Empire State Human wrote:Also - and this might surprise everyone - Shaun Murphy has offered his opinion on O'Sullivan's comments. link


Good God, I wonder how they coaxed that out of him?

Quite the coup!

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby Womble

Empire State Human wrote:Also - and this might surprise everyone - Shaun Murphy has offered his opinion on O'Sullivan's comments. link

Ronnie can often act like a spoiled brat. And Smurph is a false, nauseatingly cheesy, "look at me", goody-two-shoes. I can't be bothered to listen to either of them. No offence. rofl

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby RunningSide

Womble wrote:
Empire State Human wrote:Also - and this might surprise everyone - Shaun Murphy has offered his opinion on O'Sullivan's comments. link

Ronnie can often act like a spoiled brat. And Smurph is a false, nauseatingly cheesy, "look at me", goody-two-shoes. I can't be bothered to listen to either of them. No offence. rofl

I have same thoughts as Womble, thats a sentence I never imagined.

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby Womble

RunningSide wrote:
Womble wrote:
Empire State Human wrote:Also - and this might surprise everyone - Shaun Murphy has offered his opinion on O'Sullivan's comments. link

Ronnie can often act like a spoiled brat. And Smurph is a false, nauseatingly cheesy, "look at me", goody-two-shoes. I can't be bothered to listen to either of them. No offence. rofl

I have same thoughts as Womble, thats a sentence I never imagined.

Great Uncle Bulgaria, I haven't seen you for ages. How are you? :D

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby Empire State Human

RunningSide wrote:
Womble wrote:
Empire State Human wrote:Also - and this might surprise everyone - Shaun Murphy has offered his opinion on O'Sullivan's comments. link

Ronnie can often act like a spoiled brat. And Smurph is a false, nauseatingly cheesy, "look at me", goody-two-shoes. I can't be bothered to listen to either of them. No offence. rofl

I have same thoughts as Womble, thats a sentence I never imagined.

What's your opinion on fly-tipping?

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby RunningSide

Womble wrote:
RunningSide wrote:
Womble wrote:
Empire State Human wrote:Also - and this might surprise everyone - Shaun Murphy has offered his opinion on O'Sullivan's comments. link

Ronnie can often act like a spoiled brat. And Smurph is a false, nauseatingly cheesy, "look at me", goody-two-shoes. I can't be bothered to listen to either of them. No offence. rofl

I have same thoughts as Womble, thats a sentence I never imagined.

Great Uncle Bulgaria, I haven't seen you for ages. How are you? :D

Searching for Dessi if you must know.

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby Johnny Bravo

The_Abbott wrote: Having said that if you earn on average £2000 a month after tax thats not a bad wage to be had in snooker.

How on Earth is that not bad ?!??
A construction worker makes more for f.ucks sake <doh> <doh> <doh>
One barely covers his living expenses with that amount.
Also, take into consideration that a snooker career does not last forever, players need to be able to put aside a couple hundred thousand quid before retirement.

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby lhpirnie

Johnny Bravo wrote:
The_Abbott wrote: Having said that if you earn on average £2000 a month after tax thats not a bad wage to be had in snooker.

How on Earth is that not bad ?!??
A construction worker makes more for f.ucks sake <doh> <doh> <doh>
One barely covers his living expenses with that amount.
Also, take into consideration that a snooker career does not last forever, players need to be able to put aside a couple hundred thousand quid before retirement.

Plus the fact that snooker players have expenses to pay: travelling costs, hotels, practice facilities. It's affordable if you live with your parents, or have a wife with a good job. Overseas players have no chance, unless they come from rich families or have a sponsor.

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby Johnny Bravo

lhpirnie wrote:
Johnny Bravo wrote:
The_Abbott wrote: Having said that if you earn on average £2000 a month after tax thats not a bad wage to be had in snooker.

How on Earth is that not bad ?!??
A construction worker makes more for f.ucks sake <doh> <doh> <doh>
One barely covers his living expenses with that amount.
Also, take into consideration that a snooker career does not last forever, players need to be able to put aside a couple hundred thousand quid before retirement.

Plus the fact that snooker players have expenses to pay: travelling costs, hotels, practice facilities. It's affordable if you live with your parents, or have a wife with a good job. Overseas players have no chance, unless they come from rich families or have a sponsor.

:spot on: :hatoff: <ok> :goodpost:

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby SnookerFan

SnookerEd25 wrote:
Empire State Human wrote:Also - and this might surprise everyone - Shaun Murphy has offered his opinion on O'Sullivan's comments. link


Good God, I wonder how they coaxed that out of him?

Quite the coup!


rofl

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby SnookerFan

Johnny Bravo wrote:
The_Abbott wrote: Having said that if you earn on average £2000 a month after tax thats not a bad wage to be had in snooker.

How on Earth is that not bad ?!??
A construction worker makes more for f.ucks sake <doh> <doh> <doh>
One barely covers his living expenses with that amount.
Also, take into consideration that a snooker career does not last forever, players need to be able to put aside a couple hundred thousand quid before retirement.


We can't all be millionaires like you, Johnny.

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby The_Abbott

Johnny Bravo wrote:
The_Abbott wrote: Having said that if you earn on average £2000 a month after tax thats not a bad wage to be had in snooker.

How on Earth is that not bad ?!??
A construction worker makes more for f.ucks sake <doh> <doh> <doh>
One barely covers his living expenses with that amount.
Also, take into consideration that a snooker career does not last forever, players need to be able to put aside a couple hundred thousand quid before retirement.


A normal person on say £35,000 a year would make just over £2,000 a month AFTER tax.

It is enough to live on numbnuts

We would all like to earn the millions you make Johnhy Bravo but we live in the real world not the imaginary dream world in your head.

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby SnookerEd25

SnookerFan wrote:Image

It's a Frisp, not a crisp.


Stat :hatoff:

Re: Ron not happy at all.

Postby SnookerEd25

Am I to take it that the inaction on this thread is a positive indication of Ron’s happiness experiencing an upturn? :chin:


   

cron