lhpirnie wrote:Yes, I do think that Goldstein should have explained that better than saying "we're not interviewing Li Hang because his English isn't good enough". That makes it look like an editorial decision, but I think Goldstein as the presenter should take responsibility for explaining their rationale.
What I think the problem is with this is that broadcasters do get negative comments (and downvotes on twitter) when they interview foreigners. It seems like their response it too frequently to avoid the issue by not interviewing them, which I think is shameful. Even if they had problems with language, they should find a way, if necessary via a Zoom interpreter (the interviews were indeed conducted remotely in December). I don't believe that the media has any vendetta, but I do think they are bowing to pressure. I would like them to be a bit stronger, and fairer.
If you thought it wasn’t clear at the time I’m not sure why you said today that it was clear. I have no affection for Goldstein but it’s not fair to pretend that they obviously decided not to interview Chinese players when it’s not obvious at all.
I’ve gone back and reviewed the post-match on ES Player, and Goldstein doesn’t mention anything until a few minutes into the chat with Jimmy, which to me suggests that they were waiting to see whether Li wanted to be interviewed. If it was their decision you’d expect them to say it straight away. Just my feeling, though. What he actually says is, “Sadly Li won’t be coming in for an interview because his English isn’t strong enough” which doesn’t suggest anything one way or the other.
The thing is, Chinese players weren’t being snubbed for interviews until Covid happened so it seems likely that’s the cause and that there’s still a hangover from that at the moment (I mean there’s only been two tournaments). I think a Zoom interpreter would have made interviews very cumbersome. I am a bit surprised they didn’t just hire someone to act as interpreter, though.
What you’re saying is just conjecture, and you’re annoyed about something that actually might (I’d argue almost definitely) not be the case.