Who do you rate as the greater player?

Ronnie79 wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:Has to be - begrudgingly - Ebdon IMO for he has conquered the World

Nonsense so that makes Joe Johnson a better player than Jimmy ?

No - I think you have missed the point a little.

Jimmy and Ebdon have won the same amount of rankers with Ebdon winning the worlds amongst them.

Johnson has not won as many rankers so your logic is slightly off.

As it goes, I don't believe that Johnson is or was a better player than White. In terms of records though it would be interesting (to me) to know if Jimmy would trade his career stats for Joe's. I suspect that he might.

Ronnie79 wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:

KrazeeEyezKilla wrote:Both of them were 17-17 with Hendry in a World final.

Only one went 18-17.

Actually both ended 18-17 haha

True.

You know what I meant.

Badsnookerplayer wrote:

Ronnie79 wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:Has to be - begrudgingly - Ebdon IMO for he has conquered the World

Nonsense so that makes Joe Johnson a better player than Jimmy ?

No - I think you have missed the point a little.

Jimmy and Ebdon have won the same amount of rankers with Ebdon winning the worlds amongst them.

Johnson has not won as many rankers so your logic is slightly off.

As it goes, I don't believe that Johnson is or was a better player than White. In terms of records though it would be interesting (to me) to know if Jimmy would trade his career stats for Joe's. I suspect that he might.

He has stated he wouldn't swap his career for anyone's. To be fair to the guy, regardless of what happened, he still had a fine career

Pink Ball wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:

Ronnie79 wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:Has to be - begrudgingly - Ebdon IMO for he has conquered the World

Nonsense so that makes Joe Johnson a better player than Jimmy ?

No - I think you have missed the point a little.

Jimmy and Ebdon have won the same amount of rankers with Ebdon winning the worlds amongst them.

Johnson has not won as many rankers so your logic is slightly off.

As it goes, I don't believe that Johnson is or was a better player than White. In terms of records though it would be interesting (to me) to know if Jimmy would trade his career stats for Joe's. I suspect that he might.

He has stated he wouldn't swap his career for anyone's. To be fair to the guy, regardless of what happened, he still had a fine career

No I did not miss the point at all maybe you did. I was pointing out winning one world championship more than another player does not make you a better player. Do you get the point now ?.

Ronnie79 wrote:No I did not miss the point at all maybe you did. I was pointing out winning one world championship more than another player does not make you a better player. Do you get the point now ?.

I don't.

Can you explain it again?

Ronnie79 wrote:

Pink Ball wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:

Ronnie79 wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:Has to be - begrudgingly - Ebdon IMO for he has conquered the World

Nonsense so that makes Joe Johnson a better player than Jimmy ?

No - I think you have missed the point a little.

Jimmy and Ebdon have won the same amount of rankers with Ebdon winning the worlds amongst them.

Johnson has not won as many rankers so your logic is slightly off.

As it goes, I don't believe that Johnson is or was a better player than White. In terms of records though it would be interesting (to me) to know if Jimmy would trade his career stats for Joe's. I suspect that he might.

He has stated he wouldn't swap his career for anyone's. To be fair to the guy, regardless of what happened, he still had a fine career

No I did not miss the point at all maybe you did. I was pointing out winning one world championship more than another player does not make you a better player. Do you get the point now ?.

Don't make a pin end of yourself mate.

I was kind of agreeing with you but trying to explain the point of the thread was whether Ebdon's achievement's outstripped Whites in terms of rankers. I believed that they did hence used 'IMO'.

You seem like a very angry individual - I hope things work out better for you in the future.

Jimmy has more talent than Ebdon, but Ebdon has a much better work ethic than Jimmy.

Ronnie79, you are one aggressive bucker.

I voted for Ebdon, but it was very close for me between the two of them.

Ebdon all day long

Even though Jimmy was a better player IMO, I cannot think of one relevant statistic in which he comes off better than Ebdon.

I think that is an oxymoron but I am not sure.

Badsnookerplayer wrote:Even though Jimmy was a better player IMO, I cannot think of one relevant statistic in which he comes off better than Ebdon.

I think that is an oxymoron but I am not sure.

Like I said, Jimmy has more talent but Ebdon works much harder.

Holden Chinaski wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:Even though Jimmy was a better player IMO, I cannot think of one relevant statistic in which he comes off better than Ebdon.

I think that is an oxymoron but I am not sure.

Like I said, Jimmy has more talent but Ebdon works much harder.