by edwards2000 » 23 Feb 2014 Read
I'd love to respond to that nonsense you have just written, but Wild has decreed only one side of the debate is allowed.
-
edwards2000
- Posts: 368
- Joined: 19 December 2013
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie O Sullivan
- Highest Break: 35
- Walk-On: The Landing, Nobuo Uematsu
-
by Richproc » 23 Feb 2014 Read
Are you referring to my post edwards2000 because it is based on the facts whereas people seem to think differently about what happened when these are the only things that came out. It seems like you have your opinion about some subjects and hen become abusive to anyone whose opinion differs with yours.
Was it not you who refused to believe a cue can make a difference to players despite other people giving different opinions. I mean just cos Ronnie won the Masters with a new cue does not mean anybody can play as well with a new cue. Alex Higgins spent most of his career changing cues as he couldn't find one that matched up o his cue he won his first world title with.
-
Richproc
- Posts: 20
- Joined: 18 November 2011
- Location: Winsford Cheshire
- Snooker Idol: Steve Davis
- Highest Break: 130
by edwards2000 » 23 Feb 2014 Read
You have also misrepresented what I said about the cue issue. Clearly, you don't read what people write.
-
edwards2000
- Posts: 368
- Joined: 19 December 2013
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie O Sullivan
- Highest Break: 35
- Walk-On: The Landing, Nobuo Uematsu
-
by Wildey » 24 Feb 2014 Read
edwards2000 wrote:I'd love to respond to that nonsense you have just written, but Wild has decreed only one side of the debate is allowed.
I Said its done and dusted so there shouldnt be any more debate about it.
Stick to facts as in this moment now.......Snooker Island could be sued over continuing with this thing that happened years ago and to paint that in the same light as the Lee case is just not on because they are so different.
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64426
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Roland » 24 Feb 2014 Read
Richproc wrote:I have just read the above posts and agree with you Wildey the people on here and most other people I talk to don't seem to know the facts about the Higgins case.
1. It was a hypothetical question to match fix in a tournament that didn't exist
2. No money passed hands
3. The tape had been edited to make it look worse than it maybe was
If you are guilty for just saying you will do something then the world is stupid as he could of changed his mind the second he walked out of the room. That is why his case is different to Stephen Lees as it certainly looked like Lee did match fix and money did change hands.
Yep
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Roland » 24 Feb 2014 Read
Topic locked
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-