by Casey » 15 Mar 2010 Read
What about the top 50 are defiantly safe with the rest needing a minimum win commitment to stay on tour, say for example you have to win at least 8 matches to stay on tour, anybody that doesn’t is relegated.
Also instead of giving the newcomers the lowest ranked points, just simply double the points they earn in the firs year…simples
-
Casey
- Posts: 8520
- Joined: 03 October 2009
- Location: Ireland
- Snooker Idol: Hendry Allen
by SnookerFan » 16 Mar 2010 Read
No bottom wiping? Knowing some of the things Hearn was saying about his one-frame shoot out gimmick, I was thinking that a Loser Has To Wipe The Winner's Bottom match would suit his needs.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151123
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Bourne » 16 Mar 2010 Read
I quite like the idea of a qualifying school, much more pressure is placed on the players this way, it's going to be totally in their hands whether they stay on the next year instead of maybe having a sh*t year and just hanging in because someone else around them also did sh*t. Most of all though, we need so many tournaments that players get tested as much as possible !
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150