Re: Stephen Lee Statement
PLtheRef wrote:Monique wrote:Learn what wild? If they have done nothing and are dragged into some "scandal" by mere rumours, what is there they could do about it? Again I'm not speaking specifically about the Lee case, I'm speaking in general.
That's why your reasoning will not work. If people are innocent, there is nothing for them to have "learned" because they did nothing wrong.
What players must know is that if there is suspicion, it will be investigated to the bottom, that they will be treated fairly but that there will be no tolerance whatsoever or under the carpet sweeping if they are guilty. They must know that the consequences - if found guilty - will be career ending.
But they should also be assured that they will not been thrown out of their job on mere malevolent rumours.
Spot on Monique
Wild, your suggestion would not even stand up in the street, never mind in court.
i know your right but ive had a gut-full.
and another Matter in Law if someone is Suspected of Doing something they have not done they are suspended.
if a child accuses a teacher of molesting them do you think they are aloud to continue teaching pending a inquiry?
or a Family Member suspects a care worker is helping themselves to money of someone they care for they continue in their jobs pending a inquiry?
of course not.
but in the same way as Lee's Reputation is tarnished for no reason if Innocent those people have even More to lose by wrongfully accused when people snigger "no smoke without fire" even when found inocent
-
Wildey - Posts: 64451
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only