Murphy mardy about Ronnie comment

SnookerFan wrote:Really is much ado about nothing this, isn't it?

We’re certainly running with it

SECOND PAGE

SnookerFan wrote:Really is much ado about nothing this, isn't it?

Because Murphy’s Beenadick?

I don't think Ronnie has said anything wrong. He's basically said what everyone else has said and thought? Murphy being a bit silly for me.

Johnny Bravo wrote:This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

In pool, players do have 3 cues: 1 for breaking the balls, 1 for playing and one for jump shots.

But in snooker, jumping is not allowed, so there goes 1 out the window.
And also you don't break them hard like in pool. So there goes 2.

You don't need more than 1 cue in snooker.

The GOAT has spoken.

Murphy is somewhat right when he says that there is no love lost between them. They are very different characters and you always had moments through the years when one guy had a dig at the other. Their 2017 WC meeting could be called a needle match I'd guess.

But it obviously doesn't get the attention like ROS vs Selby would do because the H2H is very one sided in Ronnies favour.

STFU Murphy.