by Roland » 19 Feb 2011 Read
It was pretty obvious if you watched the match that Carter was trying his guts out to beat Higgins today. He was trying too hard in fact.
-
Roland
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18267
- Joined: 29 September 2009
- Location: Cannonbridge, Snooker Island
- Snooker Idol: Selby Ding Kyren Luca
- Highest Break: 102
- Walk-On: Bal Sagoth
-
by Monique » 19 Feb 2011 Read
Bourne wrote:Monique wrote:Bourne wrote:Where have I questioned his honesty ?
I'm crediting him for being smart on this actually.
You are questioning his honesty because what you suggest is that he could have actually lost on purpose. That may be "smart" but it's also dishonest.
Find me a quote where I said he lost on purpose and i'll kiss your feet
You didn't say it explicitely but come on... either he tried his best and he did not "tank" or he did "tank" and that's not very different to losing on purpose to gain an advantage. Don't play on words please: you suggested the latter, so you suggested he was dishonest.
-
Monique
- Posts: 4597
- Joined: 02 February 2010
- Location: Brussels
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: Kodachrome (Paul Simon)
-
by Bourne » 19 Feb 2011 Read
Wouldn't stand up in court i'm afraid
-
Bourne
- Posts: 17471
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: UK
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump
- Highest Break: 150
by Monique » 19 Feb 2011 Read
Bourne wrote:Wouldn't stand up in court i'm afraid
We are not in court.
And btw I have cute feet
... sporting a 3.5 and perfectly kept.
-
Monique
- Posts: 4597
- Joined: 02 February 2010
- Location: Brussels
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: Kodachrome (Paul Simon)
-
by Wildey » 19 Feb 2011 Read
-
Wildey
- Posts: 64328
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only