Topic locked

Should Wenbo Get 1 of the Wild Cards for the Masters ?

Yes
1
7%
No
13
93%
 
Total votes : 14

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Wildey » 03 Oct 2010 Read

Bourne wrote:There are no wildcards.

ive not seen anything official about that you got a source ?

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby GJ » 03 Oct 2010 Read

IT SAYS

PROVISIONAL

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Wildey » 03 Oct 2010 Read

well yes because up to tonight they couldn't fill in the gaps in the draw lol

now they got players and seeds to put in thoes gaps.

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Wildey » 03 Oct 2010 Read

what's interesting with murphy doing well in EPTC 2 Ding is seeded 9th for the masters which means he might get Ronnie,Robbo or Higgins first Match.

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Steve K » 04 Oct 2010 Read

If they pick two it should be one entertainment/crowd drawer person (White,Davis,Drago etc) and one high performer (M.Davis, Gould etc). Hopefully they wait untill after the UK championship before they announce the wild cards as someone from outside the top 32 might put in an amazing performance and be worth the wildcard more than Gould, Stevens etc.

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby sundaygirl » 04 Oct 2010 Read

Am I right in thinking that The Masters 2011 hasn't a sponsership deal yet?
A widely recognised name would help with that much more than a player who deserves to be there on merit ,but has only been heard of by the likes of us.

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby SnookerFan » 04 Oct 2010 Read

StalinESQ wrote:Zhanger :wave:


I don't know why you keep on about Zhanger. He aint getting it. He has about as much chance as me.

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Wildey » 04 Oct 2010 Read

SnookerFan wrote:
StalinESQ wrote:Zhanger :wave:


I don't know why you keep on about Zhanger. He aint getting it. He has about as much chance as me.

looking forward to seeing you play mate :redneck:

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby SnookerFan » 04 Oct 2010 Read

StalinESQ wrote:I support Zhanger - hence I want to see him at Wembley. People support Jimmy White will want the same. There are more people in China than England, so Zhanger should get the nod. :redneck:


I guess. Maybe it's because I dont support either in particular, but I don't think either of them are particularly worthy. I reckon they should give it to Martin Gould. Doubt they will though.

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Smart » 04 Oct 2010 Read

SnookerFan wrote:
StalinESQ wrote:I support Zhanger - hence I want to see him at Wembley. People support Jimmy White will want the same. There are more people in China than England, so Zhanger should get the nod. :redneck:


I guess. Maybe it's because I dont support either in particular, but I don't think either of them are particularly worthy. I reckon they should give it to Martin Gould. Doubt they will though.


yeah but are you saying that just cos he wears glasses and you feel sorry for him........................ :redneck:

Zhanger does not wear glasses so the pick should go to him. <ok>

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby SnookerFan » 04 Oct 2010 Read

StalinESQ wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:
StalinESQ wrote:I support Zhanger - hence I want to see him at Wembley. People support Jimmy White will want the same. There are more people in China than England, so Zhanger should get the nod. :redneck:


I guess. Maybe it's because I dont support either in particular, but I don't think either of them are particularly worthy. I reckon they should give it to Martin Gould. Doubt they will though.


yeah but are you saying that just cos he wears glasses and you feel sorry for him........................ :redneck:

Zhanger does not wear glasses so the pick should go to him. <ok>



It's because he chose a professional wrestler's entrance music, despite looking more like a librarian. You have to admire his audacity. <laugh>

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Wildey » 04 Oct 2010 Read

to be honest at the moment Zhanger wont get a wild card to his family Christmas party <laugh>

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Wildey » 04 Oct 2010 Read

StalinESQ wrote:
wildJONESEYE wrote:to be honest at the moment Zhanger wont get a wild card to his family Christmas party <laugh>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China

pretty sure that Buddhists don't celebrate Christmas - being that they don't believe in Jesus <laugh> :wave:

thats me told lol

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby SnookerFan » 04 Oct 2010 Read

StalinESQ wrote:
wildJONESEYE wrote:to be honest at the moment Zhanger wont get a wild card to his family Christmas party <laugh>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China

pretty sure that Buddhists don't celebrate Christmas - being that they don't believe in Jesus <laugh> :wave:


In the words of Bart Simpson; Christmas is a time for people of all religions to come together and celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ.

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Smart » 04 Oct 2010 Read

SnookerFan wrote:
StalinESQ wrote:
wildJONESEYE wrote:to be honest at the moment Zhanger wont get a wild card to his family Christmas party <laugh>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China

pretty sure that Buddhists don't celebrate Christmas - being that they don't believe in Jesus <laugh> :wave:


In the words of Bart Simpson; Christmas is a time for people of all religions to come together and celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ.


what even those who do not know who or what Jesus is <laugh> :wave:

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby SnookerFan » 04 Oct 2010 Read

StalinESQ wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:
StalinESQ wrote:
wildJONESEYE wrote:to be honest at the moment Zhanger wont get a wild card to his family Christmas party <laugh>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China

pretty sure that Buddhists don't celebrate Christmas - being that they don't believe in Jesus <laugh> :wave:


In the words of Bart Simpson; Christmas is a time for people of all religions to come together and celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ.


what even those who do not know who or what Jesus is <laugh> :wave:


That was the joke, dumbass. <laugh>

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby NedB-H » 05 Oct 2010 Read

Having two wildcards and no qualifier is a farce, is this a proper tournament or a glorified exhibition?

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby JohnFromLondonTown » 05 Oct 2010 Read

NedB-H wrote:Having two wildcards and no qualifier is a farce, is this a proper tournament or a glorified exhibition?

What would you do? :chin:

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby Wildey » 05 Oct 2010 Read

NedB-H wrote:Having two wildcards and no qualifier is a farce, is this a proper tournament or a glorified exhibition?

it used to be no qualifier and no wild card.

id go back to that.

Re: Masters Wild Card

Postby NedB-H » 05 Oct 2010 Read

JohnFromLondonTown wrote:
NedB-H wrote:Having two wildcards and no qualifier is a farce, is this a proper tournament or a glorified exhibition?

What would you do? :chin:

The recent system or what wild suggests, either have it as a straight out top 16 tournament, or open it up to everyone with a qualifier. Don't mind a wildcard(s) if everyone on the circuit has a chance to qualify anyway. Don't like them if it's just top 16 plus wildcards, that's when it turns into an invitation
Topic locked