Topic locked

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Wildey

surprise he turned that blue down even if he cocked it up burnett would be well under it on every shot.

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Casey

StalinESQ wrote:
wildJONESEYE wrote:didn't get in to the red long blue


body movement on that red


Hollow carter doesn't win finals against the big players <ok>

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Wildey

if he was playing ronnie today id say he missed the boat by not taking the blue and this frame by the balls there i think a weakness in his game.

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Wildey

god had he gone for the blue it could be over now lol

since then hes not getting chances and cocking shots up all over the shop.

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Wildey

GAME SET AND MATCH CARTER

well played not played your best bar the selby win but at the end of the day that means rubbish you lifting a trophy up after the week thats all that matters <ok>

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Bourne

Well done Allister. And well done Ricky Walden for winning another Shanghai award to go with the main title in 08, the wooden spoon. :mosh2:

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Monique

phew... that wasn't smooth LOL. But well done Ali! :D And now he's very close to Robbo in the provisional rankings and could very well overcome him before the cut-off point.

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Wildey

Monique wrote:phew... that wasn't smooth LOL. But well done Ali! :D And now he's very close to Robbo in the provisional rankings and could very well overcome him before the cut-off point.

http://www.worldsnooker.com/official.htm

look at these rankings by world snooker

on theire warped 3 year list after EPTC1 Hendry was 12th now hes 11th :huh2:

Mark Allen was above Hendry after EPTC1 now hes below Hendry after shanghai despite both losing first round in shanghai and got 980 points.

jesus christ they havent a bloody clue and confusing the players in the meantime by calling them official rankings <doh>

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Monique

wildJONESEYE wrote:
Monique wrote:phew... that wasn't smooth LOL. But well done Ali! :D And now he's very close to Robbo in the provisional rankings and could very well overcome him before the cut-off point.

http://www.worldsnooker.com/official.htm

look at these rankings by world snooker

on theire warped 3 year list after EPTC1 Hendry was 12th now hes 11th :huh2:

Mark Allen was above Hendry after EPTC1 now hes below Hendry after shanghai despite both losing first round in shanghai and got 980 points.

jesus christ they havent a bloody clue and confusing the players in the meantime by calling them official rankings <doh>


Well Dave Hendon on twitter was having a discussion with Matt and apparantly WPBSA for some reason have now taken off the points from NIT and Shanghai 2008 but not yet from GP 2008 and they say they will do that after the World Open... Beats me! Why do such a complicated and confusing thing? <doh>

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Wildey

GJtheaussiestud wrote:WHICH RANKINGS ARE 100 % ACCURATE

Matts Rankings http://prosnookerblog.com/rankings/2010 ... mment-7890

keep it there

but monique has explained what they done whitch makes it understandable how they cockerel eyed however as monique said WHATS THE BLOODY POINT LOL

and why call them official ...?????

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby GJ

why bother posting bull rubbish rankings on their official site

what a waste of time

:bs: <doh>

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Wildey

GJtheaussiestud wrote:why bother posting bull rubbish rankings on their official site

what a waste of time

:bs: <doh>


i can not for 1 minute think barry hearn is behind this but theres someone somewhere confusing everyone to rubbish.

and Steve Davis whos on the WPBSA should realize that as a player according to world snooker he is 24th and looks safe enough however realistic he plays ebdon first match in the World Open as provisional 31st ...

if mike dunn and bond gets a good draw he could be out of the top 32 easily.

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Casey

There doing what they do in tennis and are waiting until the corresponding event finishes before they post the updated ranking ie. when the shanghai this yer is over they took 08 off the list and will repeat it for every event when it finishes.

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby GJ

the clueless mugs have robbo as 3rd

<doh>

robbo WC = NUMBER 1 IN RANKINGS


:afro:

Re: Shanghai Masters Final Discussion!!!

Postby Wildey

case_master wrote:There doing what they do in tennis and are waiting until the corresponding event finishes before they post the updated ranking ie. when the shanghai this yer is over they took 08 off the list and will repeat it for every event when it finishes.

yes that does make sense if they do that i guess and if matt carries on to do it how he does it then the players will know exactly what they got to do to get in the top 48,32 or 16