Ruhr Championship (EPTC 5)

Sonny wrote:

wildLOVESWAGNER wrote:

Sonny wrote:

wildLOVESWAGNER wrote:[
Higgins was only 1,540 points ahead of Robbo .....

Mate he will only shoot up rankings if he wins matches in the meantime Harold and Jogia arent the test ahead.

He was only that far ahead when? At one point Higgins had enough points to breeze it number 1 all the way through the season had he been allowed to play.

he was 1540 points ahead after Points For NIT,Shanghai Masters and GP 2008 was deducted.

Add first 2 white columns together http://prosnookerblog.com/rankings/2010 ... ision-one/

I'll take your word for it - but then Robbo and a couple of others lost out with the Bahrain debacle so he was still in a good position even after missing the events up till now. What will he be after the UK? If he's still top 4 after that then minimal damage done you'd have to say although obviously he's got the big loss by the start of next season.

Say, is the Premier League table ready to view yet I wonder...

Sonny wrote:that's what I meant by "big loss" but then again if he picks up where he left off he'll bag a ranker or two before then anyway.

Sonny wrote:No harm in losing to Gould. At least he got a couple of wins under his belt for starters and lost to a form player with plenty of match practice.

Sonny wrote:he had matches coming out of his years?

Bourne wrote:Wild's dictionary - he can spell dyslexia correctly but when it comes to those things on the side of his head, 4 letters, it's just too taxing for him

Sonny wrote:Hahaha sorry have to laugh. John Higgins on another decent break to get to 3-3 looks like. The man is sheer class on a snooker table. Think what you want of him but when it comes down to it, he is one of the very very very best snooker players who has ever lived.

Witz78 wrote:

Sonny wrote:Hahaha sorry have to laugh. John Higgins on another decent break to get to 3-3 looks like. The man is sheer class on a snooker table. Think what you want of him but when it comes down to it, he is one of the very very very best snooker players who has ever lived.

Joe
Fred
Ray
Alex
Steve
Jimmy
Stephen
Ronnie
Mark

will always be ahead of him for me....

Sonny wrote:Based on the main criteria which is: ability to play snooker, how can you not have Higgins in your top 4 of all time?

Sonny wrote:Based on the main criteria which is: ability to play snooker, how can you not have Higgins in your top 4 of all time?

Sonny wrote:Hahaha sorry have to laugh. John Higgins on another decent break to get to 3-3 looks like. The man is sheer class on a snooker table. Think what you want of him but when it comes down to it, he is one of the very very very best snooker players who has ever lived.

wildLOVESWAGNER wrote:

Sonny wrote:Hahaha sorry have to laugh. John Higgins on another decent break to get to 3-3 looks like. The man is sheer class on a snooker table. Think what you want of him but when it comes down to it, he is one of the very very very best snooker players who has ever lived.

you really cant take nothing from this event if he wins it or lost first match it wont determine anything about John the man or Player its just good to see him playing again.

Sonny wrote:It speaks volumes for Higgins doesn't it? Despite all that's gone on, he's won his first 3 matches. What a player.